-
Zhang, C.; Bu, Y.; Ding, Y.; Xu, J.: Understanding scientific collaboration : homophily, transitivity, and preferential attachment (2018)
0.02
0.018925184 = product of:
0.03785037 = sum of:
0.03785037 = product of:
0.15140148 = sum of:
0.15140148 = weight(_text_:author's in 4011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15140148 = score(doc=4011,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33985576 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 4011, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4011)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Scientific collaboration is essential in solving problems and breeding innovation. Coauthor network analysis has been utilized to study scholars' collaborations for a long time, but these studies have not simultaneously taken different collaboration features into consideration. In this paper, we present a systematic approach to analyze the differences in possibilities that two authors will cooperate as seen from the effects of homophily, transitivity, and preferential attachment. Exponential random graph models (ERGMs) are applied in this research. We find that different types of publications one author has written play diverse roles in his/her collaborations. An author's tendency to form new collaborations with her/his coauthors' collaborators is strong, where the more coauthors one author had before, the more new collaborators he/she will attract. We demonstrate that considering the authors' attributes and homophily effects as well as the transitivity and preferential attachment effects of the coauthorship network in which they are embedded helps us gain a comprehensive understanding of scientific collaboration.
-
Ding, Y.: Scholarly communication and bibliometrics : Part 1: The scholarly communication model: literature review (1998)
0.02
0.017534504 = product of:
0.035069007 = sum of:
0.035069007 = product of:
0.070138015 = sum of:
0.070138015 = weight(_text_:b in 3995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070138015 = score(doc=3995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17917687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.3914457 = fieldWeight in 3995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3995)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- b
-
Milojevic, S.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Yan, E.; Ding, Y.: ¬The cognitive structure of Library and Information Science : analysis of article title words (2011)
0.01
0.012398765 = product of:
0.02479753 = sum of:
0.02479753 = product of:
0.04959506 = sum of:
0.04959506 = weight(_text_:b in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04959506 = score(doc=4608,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17917687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.2767939 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This study comprises a suite of analyses of words in article titles in order to reveal the cognitive structure of Library and Information Science (LIS). The use of title words to elucidate the cognitive structure of LIS has been relatively neglected. The present study addresses this gap by performing (a) co-word analysis and hierarchical clustering, (b) multidimensional scaling, and (c) determination of trends in usage of terms. The study is based on 10,344 articles published between 1988 and 2007 in 16 LIS journals. Methodologically, novel aspects of this study are: (a) its large scale, (b) removal of non-specific title words based on the "word concentration" measure (c) identification of the most frequent terms that include both single words and phrases, and (d) presentation of the relative frequencies of terms using "heatmaps". Conceptually, our analysis reveals that LIS consists of three main branches: the traditionally recognized library-related and information-related branches, plus an equally distinct bibliometrics/scientometrics branch. The three branches focus on: libraries, information, and science, respectively. In addition, our study identifies substructures within each branch. We also tentatively identify "information seeking behavior" as a branch that is establishing itself separate from the three main branches. Furthermore, we find that cognitive concepts in LIS evolve continuously, with no stasis since 1992. The most rapid development occurred between 1998 and 2001, influenced by the increased focus on the Internet. The change in the cognitive landscape is found to be driven by the emergence of new information technologies, and the retirement of old ones.
-
Ding, Y.: Applying weighted PageRank to author citation networks (2011)
0.01
0.011990811 = product of:
0.023981621 = sum of:
0.023981621 = product of:
0.047963243 = sum of:
0.047963243 = weight(_text_:22 in 4188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047963243 = score(doc=4188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1770967 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4188)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 13:02:21
-
He, B.; Ding, Y.; Ni, C.: Mining enriched contextual information of scientific collaboration : a meso perspective (2011)
0.01
0.008767252 = product of:
0.017534504 = sum of:
0.017534504 = product of:
0.035069007 = sum of:
0.035069007 = weight(_text_:b in 4444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035069007 = score(doc=4444,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17917687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.05057262 = queryNorm
0.19572285 = fieldWeight in 4444, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.542962 = idf(docFreq=3476, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4444)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
