Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

0.011006043 = product of:
  0.0770423 = sum of:
    0.043931052 = weight(_text_:elektronische in 6649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043931052 = score(doc=6649,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14013545 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.3134899 = fieldWeight in 6649, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6649)
    0.033111244 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 6649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033111244 = score(doc=6649,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.121660605 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.27216077 = fieldWeight in 6649, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6649)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Abstract

Auf der Grundlage einer eigens entworfenen Dokumenttypdefinition für Dissertationen (DiML) wurden an der Humboldt-Universität Technologien und Konzepte entwickelt, um SGML/XML als Archivformat für elektronische Dissertationen innerhalb der Universitätsbibliothek zu integrieren. Ein Austausch mit Universitäten, die gleichartige Konzepte entwickeln, zeigt, daß die Probleme bei der Durchsetzung vor allem im Aufwand der Strukturierung bzw. Nachbearbeitung durch die Autoren bzw. die Bibliothek zu sehen sind. Daher wird versucht, durch die an die Bedürfnisse der Autoren angepaßte Benutzerschnittstellen die Arbeit für diese zu vereinfachen, um das in den Dissertationen enthaltene Wissen durch die Universitätsbibliotheken für ihre Leser nutzbar zu machen

0.008875413 = product of:
  0.12425578 = sum of:
    0.12425578 = weight(_text_:elektronische in 4983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12425578 = score(doc=4983,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14013545 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.8866834 = fieldWeight in 4983, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4983)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Form

Elektronische Dokumente

0.0073961774 = product of:
  0.10354648 = sum of:
    0.10354648 = weight(_text_:elektronische in 4984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10354648 = score(doc=4984,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14013545 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.7389028 = fieldWeight in 4984, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.728978 = idf(docFreq=1061, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4984)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Form

Elektronische Dokumente

0.0029766145 = product of:
  0.020836301 = sum of:
    0.016555622 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016555622 = score(doc=1195,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.121660605 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.13608038 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
    0.00428068 = weight(_text_:information in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00428068 = score(doc=1195,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.08228803 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Abstract

Sponsored by the German Ministry of Education and Research with funding of 800.000 EURO, the German Network of Expertise in long-term storage of digital resources (nestor) began in June 2003 as a cooperative effort of 6 partners representing different players within the field of long-term preservation. The partners include: * The German National Library (Die Deutsche Bibliothek) as the lead institution for the project * The State and University Library of Lower Saxony Göttingen (Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen) * The Computer and Media Service and the University Library of Humboldt-University Berlin (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin) * The Bavarian State Library in Munich (Bayerische Staatsbibliothek) * The Institute for Museum Information in Berlin (Institut für Museumskunde) * General Directorate of the Bavarian State Archives (GDAB) As in other countries, long-term preservation of digital resources has become an important issue in Germany in recent years. Nevertheless, coming to agreement with institutions throughout the country to cooperate on tasks for a long-term preservation effort has taken a great deal of effort. Although there had been considerable attention paid to the preservation of physical media like CD-ROMS, technologies available for the long-term preservation of digital publications like e-books, digital dissertations, websites, etc., are still lacking. Considering the importance of the task within the federal structure of Germany, with the responsibility of each federal state for its science and culture activities, it is obvious that the approach to a successful solution of these issues in Germany must be a cooperative approach. Since 2000, there have been discussions about strategies and techniques for long-term archiving of digital information, particularly within the distributed structure of Germany's library and archival institutions. A key part of all the previous activities was focusing on using existing standards and analyzing the context in which those standards would be applied. One such activity, the Digital Library Forum Planning Project, was done on behalf of the German Ministry of Education and Research in 2002, where the vision of a digital library in 2010 that can meet the changing and increasing needs of users was developed and described in detail, including the infrastructure required and how the digital library would work technically, what it would contain and how it would be organized. The outcome was a strategic plan for certain selected specialist areas, where, amongst other topics, a future call for action for long-term preservation was defined, described and explained against the background of practical experience.