Vizine-Goetz, D.; Drabenstott, K.M.: Computer and manual analysis of subject terms entered by online catalog users (1991)
0.02
0.019963596 = product of:
0.039927192 = sum of:
0.039927192 = product of:
0.079854384 = sum of:
0.079854384 = weight(_text_:headings in 3679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.079854384 = score(doc=3679,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24837378 = queryWeight, product of:
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.051211677 = queryNorm
0.3215089 = fieldWeight in 3679, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3679)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Subject queries were extracted from 3 universities' online catalogues and analysed to determine the extend to which they matched subject headings in the LCSH. Computer analyses show that nearly 25% of the subject queries entered by online catalogue users are exact matches of LCSH. Yet, manual analyses show that, even though a user matches or closely matches LCSH-mr, the citations retrieved by this vocabulary are not necessarily satisfactory. Sometimes the closest LCSH-mr is not at all pertinent to a user's topic of interest. This study presents reasons why close matches of LCSH-mr are not always satisfactory and suggests approaches to finding the best matches of the catalogue's controlled vocabulary
