Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Drabenstott, K.M."
  • × author_ss:"Vizine-Goetz, D."
  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  1. Drabenstott, K.M.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Search trees for subject searching in online catalogs (1990) 0.00
    0.0010663582 = product of:
      0.015995372 = sum of:
        0.014591247 = product of:
          0.029182494 = sum of:
            0.029182494 = weight(_text_:online in 2431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029182494 = score(doc=2431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.5364998 = fieldWeight in 2431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2431)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0014041257 = product of:
          0.004212377 = sum of:
            0.004212377 = weight(_text_:a in 2431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004212377 = score(doc=2431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2431)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Type
    a
  2. Vizine-Goetz, D.; Drabenstott, K.M.: Computer and manual analysis of subject terms entered by online catalog users (1991) 0.00
    6.9262006E-4 = product of:
      0.0103893 = sum of:
        0.009477294 = product of:
          0.018954588 = sum of:
            0.018954588 = weight(_text_:online in 3679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018954588 = score(doc=3679,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.34846687 = fieldWeight in 3679, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3679)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        9.120064E-4 = product of:
          0.0027360192 = sum of:
            0.0027360192 = weight(_text_:a in 3679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0027360192 = score(doc=3679,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 3679, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3679)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Subject queries were extracted from 3 universities' online catalogues and analysed to determine the extend to which they matched subject headings in the LCSH. Computer analyses show that nearly 25% of the subject queries entered by online catalogue users are exact matches of LCSH. Yet, manual analyses show that, even though a user matches or closely matches LCSH-mr, the citations retrieved by this vocabulary are not necessarily satisfactory. Sometimes the closest LCSH-mr is not at all pertinent to a user's topic of interest. This study presents reasons why close matches of LCSH-mr are not always satisfactory and suggests approaches to finding the best matches of the catalogue's controlled vocabulary
    Type
    a