Drabenstott, K.M.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Search trees for subject searching in online catalogs (1990)
0.00
7.708376E-4 = product of:
0.0115625635 = sum of:
0.00705523 = weight(_text_:in in 2431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00705523 = score(doc=2431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 2431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2431)
0.004507334 = weight(_text_:s in 2431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004507334 = score(doc=2431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 2431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2431)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 8(1990) no.3, S.7-20
Vizine-Goetz, D.; Drabenstott, K.M.: Computer and manual analysis of subject terms entered by online catalog users (1991)
0.00
2.890641E-4 = product of:
0.0043359613 = sum of:
0.0026457112 = weight(_text_:in in 3679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0026457112 = score(doc=3679,freq=2.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 3679, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3679)
0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 3679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0016902501 = score(doc=3679,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3679, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3679)
0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- Subject queries were extracted from 3 universities' online catalogues and analysed to determine the extend to which they matched subject headings in the LCSH. Computer analyses show that nearly 25% of the subject queries entered by online catalogue users are exact matches of LCSH. Yet, manual analyses show that, even though a user matches or closely matches LCSH-mr, the citations retrieved by this vocabulary are not necessarily satisfactory. Sometimes the closest LCSH-mr is not at all pertinent to a user's topic of interest. This study presents reasons why close matches of LCSH-mr are not always satisfactory and suggests approaches to finding the best matches of the catalogue's controlled vocabulary
- Pages
- S.156-161.