Search (27 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Drabenstott, K.M."
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Drabenstott, K.M.; Riester, L.C.; Dede, B.A.: Shelflisting using expert systems (1992) 0.01
    0.008833611 = product of:
      0.03238991 = sum of:
        0.0044180867 = weight(_text_:a in 2101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0044180867 = score(doc=2101,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 2101, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2101)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 2101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=2101,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2101, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2101)
        0.025194194 = weight(_text_:u in 2101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025194194 = score(doc=2101,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 2101, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2101)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    A prototype expert system for the computer science section (QA75 to QA76.95) of Library of Congress Classification was built using the Mahogany Professional expert system shell. The prototype demonstrates an expert systes application in which the system is enlisted as an intelligent job aid to assist users during the actual performance of shelflisting
    Pages
    S.199-208
    Source
    Classification research for knowledge representation and organization. Proc. 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991. Ed. by N.J. Williamson u. M. Hudon
    Type
    a
  2. Drabenstott, K.M.: Classification to the rescue : handling the problems of too many and too few retrievals (1996) 0.01
    0.0064738668 = product of:
      0.02373751 = sum of:
        0.0023430442 = weight(_text_:a in 5164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0023430442 = score(doc=5164,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 5164, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5164)
        0.019311246 = weight(_text_:r in 5164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019311246 = score(doc=5164,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 5164, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5164)
        0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 5164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0020832212 = score(doc=5164,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 5164, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5164)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Pages
    S.107-118
    Source
    Knowledge organization and change: Proceedings of the Fourth International ISKO Conference, 15-18 July 1996, Library of Congress, Washington, DC. Ed.: R. Green
    Type
    a
  3. Drabenstott, K.M.; Simcox, S.; Fenton, E.G.: End-user understanding of subject headings in library catalogs (1999) 0.00
    0.0043894653 = product of:
      0.016094705 = sum of:
        0.0023430442 = weight(_text_:a in 1333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0023430442 = score(doc=1333,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 1333, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1333)
        0.00294612 = weight(_text_:s in 1333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00294612 = score(doc=1333,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 1333, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1333)
        0.010805541 = product of:
          0.021611081 = sum of:
            0.021611081 = weight(_text_:22 in 1333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021611081 = score(doc=1333,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1333, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1333)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 43(1999) no.3, S.140-160
    Type
    a
  4. Drabenstott, K.M.: Enhancing a new design for subject access to online catalogs (1994) 0.00
    0.0026166236 = product of:
      0.01439143 = sum of:
        0.008836173 = weight(_text_:a in 6831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008836173 = score(doc=6831,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 6831, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6831)
        0.0055552567 = weight(_text_:s in 6831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0055552567 = score(doc=6831,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 6831, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6831)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Source
    Annual review of OCLC research. 1994, S.52-54
    Type
    a
  5. Drabenstott, K.M.; Demeyer, A.N.; Gerckens, J.; Poe, D.T.: Analysis of a bibliographic database enhanced with a library classification (1990) 0.00
    0.002605482 = product of:
      0.014330151 = sum of:
        0.0094693005 = weight(_text_:a in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0094693005 = score(doc=5275,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.3089162 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
        0.0048608496 = weight(_text_:s in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0048608496 = score(doc=5275,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 34(1990), S.179-198
    Type
    a
  6. Drabenstott, K.M.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Search trees for subject searching in online catalogs (1990) 0.00
    0.002146068 = product of:
      0.011803374 = sum of:
        0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 2431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0062481174 = score(doc=2431,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2431, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2431)
        0.0055552567 = weight(_text_:s in 2431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0055552567 = score(doc=2431,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 2431, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2431)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 8(1990) no.3, S.7-20
    Type
    a
  7. Drabenstott, K.M.: Interpreting the findings of "A study of library users and their understanding of subject headings" (1999) 0.00
    0.0019624678 = product of:
      0.010793572 = sum of:
        0.0066271294 = weight(_text_:a in 6178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0066271294 = score(doc=6178,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 6178, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6178)
        0.0041664424 = weight(_text_:s in 6178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0041664424 = score(doc=6178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 6178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6178)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Source
    Technicalities. 19(1999) no.4, S.13-15
    Type
    a
  8. Drabenstott, K.M.; Weller, M.S.: Testing a new design for subject access to online catalogs (1995) 0.00
    0.0019233326 = product of:
      0.010578329 = sum of:
        0.0046860883 = weight(_text_:a in 385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0046860883 = score(doc=385,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 385, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=385)
        0.00589224 = weight(_text_:s in 385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00589224 = score(doc=385,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.20385705 = fieldWeight in 385, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=385)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Library resources and technical services 41(1997) no.1, S.60-67 (B.H. Weinberg)
    Pages
    370 S
  9. Drabenstott, K.M.; Simcox, S.; Fenton, E.G.: Do patrons understand Library of Congress Subject Headings? (1999) 0.00
    0.0019233326 = product of:
      0.010578329 = sum of:
        0.0046860883 = weight(_text_:a in 6072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0046860883 = score(doc=6072,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 6072, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6072)
        0.00589224 = weight(_text_:s in 6072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00589224 = score(doc=6072,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.20385705 = fieldWeight in 6072, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6072)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Source
    Technicalities. 19(1999) no.1, S.6-9
    Type
    a
  10. Drabenstott, K.M.: Enhancing a new design for subject access to online catalogs (1994) 0.00
    0.0018034211 = product of:
      0.009918815 = sum of:
        0.0039050733 = weight(_text_:a in 382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0039050733 = score(doc=382,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 382, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=382)
        0.006013742 = weight(_text_:s in 382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006013742 = score(doc=382,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.20806074 = fieldWeight in 382, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=382)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Library and information science research 18(1996) no.1, S.87-89 (C.A. Hert), Library resources and technical services 41(1997) no.1, S.60-67 (B.H. Weinberg)
    Pages
    162 S
  11. Drabenstott, K.M.; Weller, M.S.: Testing a new design for subject searching in online catalogs (1994) 0.00
    0.0017751341 = product of:
      0.009763237 = sum of:
        0.0069856085 = weight(_text_:a in 7716) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0069856085 = score(doc=7716,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 7716, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7716)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 7716) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=7716,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 7716, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7716)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    Library users continue to experience difficulty in using the online catalog, particularly in the area of subject access. This project describes a test of a new design for subject access to online catalogs. The new design requires a wide range of subject searching capabilities and search trees to govern the system's selection of searching capabilities in response to user queries. Is the performance of search trees superior to subject searching approaches chosen at random? This project is geared to make that determination
    Source
    Library hi tech. 12(1994) no.1, S.67-76,86
    Type
    a
  12. Drabenstott, K.M.: ¬The need for machine-readable authority records for topical subdivisions (1992) 0.00
    0.0016410447 = product of:
      0.009025746 = sum of:
        0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 1503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0062481174 = score(doc=1503,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 1503, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1503)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 1503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=1503,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1503, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1503)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    This paper recognizes the limitations of the existing file of Library of Congress authority records for subject heading assignment and validation. It makes recommendations for a new machine-readable file of authority records for topical subdivisions and for enhancements to the existing subject authority file. The recommended changes qould enable online systems to assist in subject heading formulation and verify, with limited assistance by human intermediaries, the individual components of subdivided headings. A study of subdivided subject headings in a large bibliographic database forms the basis of the recommendations
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 11(1992), S.91-104
    Type
    a
  13. Drabenstott, K.M.: Facilitating geographic subdivision assignment in subject headings (1992) 0.00
    0.0015532422 = product of:
      0.008542832 = sum of:
        0.006112407 = weight(_text_:a in 2708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006112407 = score(doc=2708,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 2708, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2708)
        0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 2708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0024304248 = score(doc=2708,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 2708, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2708)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    Recognises the limitations of the existing files of Library of Congress name and subject authority records for indirect geographic subdivision. Makes recommendations for enhancements to existing authority records, which would enable online systems to assist in subject heading formulation and verify, with limited assistance by human intermediaries, whether geographic subdivision is authorized for use with a particular main heading and whether the correct form of indirect geographic subdivision is authorized for use with a particular main heading and whether the correct form of indirect geographic subdivision is given. A study of subdivided subject headings in a large bibliographic data base forms the basis of the recommendations
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 36(1992) no.4, S.411-425
    Type
    a
  14. Drabenstott, K.M.; Weller, M.S.: ¬A comparative approach to system evaluation : delegating control of retrieval tests to an experimental online system (1996) 0.00
    0.0014857801 = product of:
      0.00817179 = sum of:
        0.0047346503 = weight(_text_:a in 7435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0047346503 = score(doc=7435,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 7435, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7435)
        0.00343714 = weight(_text_:s in 7435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00343714 = score(doc=7435,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 7435, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7435)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the comparative approach to system evaluation used in this research project which delegated the administartion of an online retrieval test to an experimental online catalogue to produce data for evaluating the effectiveness of a new subject access design. Describes the methods enlisted to sort out problem test administration, e.g. to identify out-of-scope queries, incomplete system administration, and suspect post-search questionnaire responses. Covers how w the researchers handled problem search administrations and what actions they would use to reduce or eliminate the occurrence of such administrations in future online retrieval tests that delegate control of retrieval tests to online systems
    Pages
    S.34-40
    Source
    Global complexity: information, chaos and control. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, ASIS'96, Baltimore, Maryland, 21-24 Oct 1996. Ed.: S. Hardin
    Type
    a
  15. Drabenstott, K.M.; Weller, M.S.: Failure analysis of subject searches in a test of a new design for subject access to online catalogs (1996) 0.00
    0.0013806598 = product of:
      0.0075936285 = sum of:
        0.0058576106 = weight(_text_:a in 4382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0058576106 = score(doc=4382,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.19109234 = fieldWeight in 4382, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4382)
        0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 4382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0017360178 = score(doc=4382,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4382, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4382)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes the findings of a research project that tested a new subject-access design in an experimental online catalog that had a wide range of subject-searching capabilities and search trees to govern the system's selection of searching capabilities in response to user queries. Library users at 2 academic libraries searched this experimental catalog for topics of their own choosing, judges the usefulness of retrieved titles, and answered post-search questions about their searching experiences. Mixed results from a quantitative analysis (i.e., precision scores) were supplemented with the more conclusive results from a qualitative analysis (i.e., failure analysis). Overall, analyses demonstrated that the new subject-access design that featured search trees was more effective in selecting a subject-searching approach that would prooduce useful information for the subjects users seek than users would select on their own. The qualitative analysis was especially helpful in providing recommendations for improving specific subject-searching approaches to increase their effenciency, increase user perseverance, and encourage browsing. It also suggested enhancements to the new subject-searching design to enable systems to respond to the wide variety of user queries for subjects
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.7, S.519-537
    Type
    a
  16. Drabenstott, K.M.: Experiences with online catalogs in the USA using a classification system as a subject searching tool (1990) 0.00
    0.001302741 = product of:
      0.0071650753 = sum of:
        0.0047346503 = weight(_text_:a in 4786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0047346503 = score(doc=4786,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 4786, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4786)
        0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 4786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0024304248 = score(doc=4786,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 4786, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4786)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Pages
    S.35-46
    Type
    a
  17. Drabenstott, K.M.; Weller, M.S.: Improving personal-name searching in online catalogs (1996) 0.00
    0.001302741 = product of:
      0.0071650753 = sum of:
        0.0047346503 = weight(_text_:a in 6742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0047346503 = score(doc=6742,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 6742, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6742)
        0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 6742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0024304248 = score(doc=6742,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 6742, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6742)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study to examine the performance of online catalogue searches involving personal names and to recommend improvements to the basic system approach to soliciting user queries and searching for them. The research questions addressed in the study wre: how online systems can chose searching approaches on their own that are likely to produce useful retrieval; how online systems solicit queries from users; and how users respond to an experimental online catalogue that prompts them for the different elements of their personal name queries. Improvements include: the implementation of a new design for online catalogue searching that features search trees; new methods for soliciting user queries bearing personal names; and enlisting the participation of online catalogue users in the evaluation of system prompts, instructions, and messages that request input from them
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 15(1996) no.3, S.135-155
    Type
    a
  18. Franz, L.; Powell, J.; Jude, S.; Drabenstott, K.M.: End user understanding of subdivided headings (1994) 0.00
    0.0012735258 = product of:
      0.0070043914 = sum of:
        0.0040582716 = weight(_text_:a in 1163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0040582716 = score(doc=1163,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 1163, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1163)
        0.00294612 = weight(_text_:s in 1163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00294612 = score(doc=1163,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 1163, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1163)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a study to investigate end user understanding of subdivided subject headings in their current form and in the form proposed by the first recommendation of the Library of Congress Subject Subdivisions Conference. The impetus for this study was a charge by the Subject Analysis Committee of the ALA to respond to the first recommendation of the LC Subject Subdivisions Conference that proposed standardizing the order of subject subdivisions. Questionnaires bearing subdivided subject headings in the 'current' form and in the form proposed were distributed to users and professional cataloguers who were asked for the meaning of individual headings. The end users' responses to cataloguers' responses were compared to determine end users' level of understanding of subdivided subject headings. An analysis of end user interpretations demonstrated that they interpreted the meaning of subject headings in the same manner as cataloguers about 40% of the time for 'current' forms of subject headings and about 32% of the time for 'proposed' forms of subject headings. Concludes with specific recommendations about the first recommendation of the LC Subject Subdivisions Conference and general recommendations about increasing end user understanding of subdivided subject headinbgs
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 38(1994) no.3, S.213-226
    Type
    a
  19. Drabenstott, K.M.; Dede, B.A.R.; Leavit, M.: ¬The changes of meaning in subdivided subject headings (1999) 0.00
    0.0012307836 = product of:
      0.0067693098 = sum of:
        0.0046860883 = weight(_text_:a in 5353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0046860883 = score(doc=5353,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 5353, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5353)
        0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 5353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0020832212 = score(doc=5353,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 5353, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5353)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    The impetus for a large-scale study on subject heading understanding was a recommendation of the Library of Congress (LC) Subject Subdivisions Conference that suggested standardizing the order of subject subdivisions for the purpose of simplifying subject cataloging. This paper focuses on unexpected large-scale study findings about multiple meanings for subdivided subject headings and the effects that changes of meaning for different orders of subdivisions had on the meanings that end users and librarians provided to subdivided subject headings. Findings about changes of meaning in subdivided subject headings did not dissuade the authors regarding their recommendation that the library community adopt a standard order of subdivisions. The authors also give suggestions for additional studies of subject heading understanding that build on this one.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 28(1999) no.3, S.19-43
    Type
    a
  20. Drabenstott, K.M.: Period subdivisions in the Library of Congress Subject Headings system : some thoughts and recommendations for the future (1992) 0.00
    0.0012307836 = product of:
      0.0067693098 = sum of:
        0.0046860883 = weight(_text_:a in 543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0046860883 = score(doc=543,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 543, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=543)
        0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0020832212 = score(doc=543,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 543, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=543)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    This paper recognizes the limitations of the existing file of Library of Congress (LC) subject authority records for subject heading assignment and validation. it makes recommendations for a new file of machine readable authority records for period subdivisions and for enhancements to the existings file of subject authority records. Recommended changes would enable online systems to assist in subject heading formulations and verify, with limited assistance by human intermediaries, the individual components of subdivided headings. The recommendations are timely in view of changes to the forms of period subdivisions that the Library of Congress is studying to facilitate the display of period subdivisions in chronological order. The availability of machine-readable authority records for most period subdivisions would enable online systems to automatically make changes to the forms of period subdivisions in bibliographic records using cross references for previously-used forms in the autority records for the new forms. The paper also discusses issues arising from an enhancement of the existing controlled system of period subdivision. A study of subdivided subject headings in a large bibliographic database forms the basis of the recommendations
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 15(1992) no.4, S.19-45
    Type
    a