Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Dunsire, G."
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Danskin, A.; Dunsire, G.; Edwards, S.: RDA international (2015) 0.01
    0.013500062 = product of:
      0.07762536 = sum of:
        0.00895379 = weight(_text_:und in 2525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00895379 = score(doc=2525,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.17141339 = fieldWeight in 2525, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2525)
        0.018109638 = product of:
          0.036219276 = sum of:
            0.036219276 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036219276 = score(doc=2525,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10505787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.34475547 = fieldWeight in 2525, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2525)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.036219276 = weight(_text_:bibliothekswesen in 2525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036219276 = score(doc=2525,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10505787 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.34475547 = fieldWeight in 2525, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.457672 = idf(docFreq=1392, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2525)
        0.01434265 = product of:
          0.0286853 = sum of:
            0.0286853 = weight(_text_:international in 2525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0286853 = score(doc=2525,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.36486188 = fieldWeight in 2525, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2525)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.17391305 = coord(4/23)
    
    Abstract
    RDA has always been a continually evolving standard that aims to reflect the requirements of the cataloguing community. Simon Edwards will highlight the steps towards a further internationalisation and exploration of wider cultural heritage description communities. Gordon Dunsire will point out the potential implementations of RDA data in various database structures and describes the possibilities for further work with RDA and linked data scenarios in international communities. The third part of the article reflects the experience of the British Library in applying RDA in the last years. Alan Danskin gives an overview of the transition period from the project organization until training.
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 62(2015) H.6, S.305-317
  2. Dunsire, G.: Interoperability and semantics in RDF representations of FRBR, FRAD and FRSAD (2011) 0.00
    0.0026828572 = product of:
      0.020568572 = sum of:
        0.0063955644 = weight(_text_:und in 651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0063955644 = score(doc=651,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 651, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=651)
        0.0039282576 = product of:
          0.007856515 = sum of:
            0.007856515 = weight(_text_:1 in 651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007856515 = score(doc=651,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 651, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=651)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0102447495 = product of:
          0.020489499 = sum of:
            0.020489499 = weight(_text_:international in 651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020489499 = score(doc=651,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.26061562 = fieldWeight in 651, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=651)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.13043478 = coord(3/23)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes recent work on registering Resource Description Framework (RDF) versions of the entities and relationships from the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and Functional Requirements for Authority Data (FRAD) models developed by the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA). FRBR was developed several years before FRAD, and is under-developed in areas which FRAD was expected to cover; FRAD therefore makes significance reference to FRBR. Similarly, FRAD leaves a full treatment of subject authority data to the ongoing development of Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) which was finalised during 2010. Although the FRBR Review Group is charged with consolidating all three models in due course, the RDF versions of FRBR, FRAD, and FRSAD are being created in separate namespaces, with a separate Web Ontology Language (OWL) ontology to connect the three models. The paper discusses interoperability issues arising from this work. Such issues include class definitions and sub-classes, reciprocal properties, and disjoint classes and properties. The paper discusses similar work on the International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD), also maintained by IFLA, and related issues arising from the RDF representation of the metadata element set of RDA: resource description and access, which is based on the FRBR and FRAD models. The work is ongoing, and the paper updates the original conference presentation to the end of October 2010.
    Series
    Bibliotheca Academica - Reihe Informations- und Bibliothekswissenschaften; Bd. 1
  3. Dunsire, G.; Nicholson, D.: Signposting the crossroads : terminology Web services and classification-based interoperability (2010) 0.00
    0.0013240816 = product of:
      0.015226938 = sum of:
        0.0072441325 = product of:
          0.014488265 = sum of:
            0.014488265 = weight(_text_:international in 4066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014488265 = score(doc=4066,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.18428308 = fieldWeight in 4066, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4066)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.007982805 = product of:
          0.01596561 = sum of:
            0.01596561 = weight(_text_:22 in 4066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01596561 = score(doc=4066,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08253069 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4066, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4066)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Content
    Teil von: Papers from Classification at a Crossroads: Multiple Directions to Usability: International UDC Seminar 2009-Part 2
    Date
    6. 1.2011 19:22:48
  4. Dunsire, G.: Towards an internationalization of RDA management and development (2016) 0.00
    6.546369E-4 = product of:
      0.015056648 = sum of:
        0.015056648 = product of:
          0.030113297 = sum of:
            0.030113297 = weight(_text_:international in 2956) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030113297 = score(doc=2956,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.38302523 = fieldWeight in 2956, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2956)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the progress that has been made to internationalize the management and development of RDA: Resource Description and Access. RDA has been designed for an international environment, and is used in a number of countries worldwide. The paper describes the impact that international adoption of RDA had on the arrangements for its governance, including a new structure for ensuring international participation. It discusses the progress that has been made to improve wider input into the processes for its development, including working groups, liaisons with related standards organizations, and cataloguing hackathons. The paper is based on desk research of published resources, including websites, blogs, and conference presentations. The paper concludes that the intention to internationalize RDA is serious and has made a good use of its opportunities, although threats to its success remain.
  5. Willer, M.; Dunsire, G.: ISBD, the UNIMARC bibliographic format, and RDA : interoperability issues in namespaces and the linked data environment (2014) 0.00
    6.2359346E-4 = product of:
      0.01434265 = sum of:
        0.01434265 = product of:
          0.0286853 = sum of:
            0.0286853 = weight(_text_:international in 1999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0286853 = score(doc=1999,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.36486188 = fieldWeight in 1999, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1999)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Abstract
    The article is an updated and expanded version of a paper presented to International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions in 2013. It describes recent work involving the representation of International Standard for Bibliographic Description (ISBD) and UNIMARC (UNIversal MARC) in Resource Description Framework (RDF), the basis of the Semantic Web and linked data. The UNIMARC Bibliographic format is used to illustrate issues arising from the development of a bibliographic element set and its semantic alignment with ISBD. The article discusses the use of such alignments in the automated processing of linked data for interoperability, using examples from ISBD, UNIMARC, and Resource Description and Access.
  6. Dunsire, G.: FRBR and the Semantic Web (2012) 0.00
    4.903207E-4 = product of:
      0.011277375 = sum of:
        0.011277375 = product of:
          0.02255475 = sum of:
            0.02255475 = weight(_text_:29 in 1928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02255475 = score(doc=1928,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1928, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1928)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Date
    29. 5.2015 10:50:02
  7. Dunsire, G.: ¬The role of ISBD in the linked data environment (2014) 0.00
    4.4094716E-4 = product of:
      0.010141784 = sum of:
        0.010141784 = product of:
          0.020283569 = sum of:
            0.020283569 = weight(_text_:international in 1997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020283569 = score(doc=1997,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2579963 = fieldWeight in 1997, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1997)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Abstract
    The article discusses the use of International Standard for Bibliographic Description (ISBD) in linked data application profiles and mappings to other bibliographic element sets including UNIMARC (UNIversal MARC), MARC 21, and Resource Description and Access (RDA), establishing ISBD's support for hierarchical relationships between fine-grained properties for resource attributes and coarser-grained aggregations for end-user displays of data triples, and interoperability of metadata derived from different schema. Separation of ISBD punctuation from element properties allows its use in text-based displays while accommodating innovative ways of presenting record-level sets of linked data. The article concludes with a discussion of the issues facing ISBD in maintaining a role in the future library linked data environment.