Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Dwyer, J."
  1. Dwyer, J.: ¬The cataloguers' 'invisible college' at work : the case of the dirty database test (1991) 0.04
    0.041007467 = product of:
      0.10251866 = sum of:
        0.007078358 = weight(_text_:a in 5834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007078358 = score(doc=5834,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 5834, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5834)
        0.095440306 = weight(_text_:91 in 5834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.095440306 = score(doc=5834,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25837386 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.3693884 = fieldWeight in 5834, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5722036 = idf(docFreq=456, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5834)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The informal networks that exists within a profession are sometimes refered to as the invisible college. Invisible colleges employ various media each of which has certain inherent limitations. The exceptions are electronic mail systems and bulletin boards which have made a whole new level of invisible college operations possible. Reports an exchange that took place on Public-Access Computer Systems-Libraries (PACS-L) and the Library Cataloguing and Authorities Discussion Group (AUTOCAT) in Mar-Apr 91. Describes the 'Dirty Database Test' which examines the extent to which misspellings erode the effectiveness of the online catalogue. Results indicate that quality control measures can be developed that are appropriate to individual libraries and available resources and that electronic mail can also be used to share, critcise and develop ideas and strategies more broadly and rapdly than ever before
    Type
    a
  2. Dwyer, J.: Bibliographic records enhancement : from the drawing board to the catalog screen (1991) 0.01
    0.0056083994 = product of:
      0.014020998 = sum of:
        0.00770594 = weight(_text_:a in 514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00770594 = score(doc=514,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 514, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=514)
        0.006315058 = product of:
          0.012630116 = sum of:
            0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012630116 = score(doc=514,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 514, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=514)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Contents notes can improve online access to works containing essays, short stories, and significantly titles chapters. Few records in bibliographic utilities include contents notes. The OCLC PRISM service may provide an opportunity to cooperatively build a contents-enriched database. This paper discusses some issues related to the creation of enhanced records and their display in online cataloges. It also describes one library's efforts to add contents notes lically and to participate in an anticipated OCLC pilot project
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Enhancing Access to Information: Designing Catalogs for the 21st Century
    Type
    a
  3. Dwyer, J.: How deep is your database? : the OCLC pilot project on contents enrichment (1991) 0.00
    0.0013622305 = product of:
      0.0068111527 = sum of:
        0.0068111527 = weight(_text_:a in 3853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0068111527 = score(doc=3853,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3853, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3853)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Type
    a