Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Dyer, H."
  1. Dyer, H.: Beyond relevance, precision and recall : the 'worth' of information retrieval results (1994) 0.01
    0.01291258 = product of:
      0.05810661 = sum of:
        0.025402876 = weight(_text_:of in 8321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025402876 = score(doc=8321,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.41465375 = fieldWeight in 8321, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8321)
        0.03270373 = weight(_text_:systems in 8321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03270373 = score(doc=8321,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12039685 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.2716328 = fieldWeight in 8321, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0731742 = idf(docFreq=5561, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8321)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    The existing tools of relevance, recall and precision have their place in the evaluation of information retrieval systems, but do not tell the whole story. They cannot, for example, make allowance for the enquirer already knowing of the existence of a document or the subsequent availability of items. Utility theory goes part way towards meeting the need by assessing the likely usefulness of documents. Arguing that information is not information until it is used, the paper suggests an additional approach to information system evaluation - the 'use-value' of information
    Source
    Journal of document and text management. 2(1994) no.1, S.35-47
  2. Dyer, H.; Bouchet, M.-L.: ¬A comparison between the perceived value of information retrieved via end-user searching of CD-ROMs and mediated online searching (1995) 0.00
    0.0021780923 = product of:
      0.01960283 = sum of:
        0.01960283 = weight(_text_:of in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01960283 = score(doc=2417,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    W.S. Cooper's utility theory was used to evaluate end user and mediated searching of online and CD-ROM databases. The searches were conducted by 510 end users, using MEDLINE. The relevance of the references and the usefulness of the documents retrieved were examnied. The study also assessed the perceived value to end users of the information retrieved. Mediated online searching cost 3 times as much as end user CD-ROM searching, but was only about twice as effective in terms of user satisfaction; user convenience should be a high priority for the information provider and mediated CD-ROM searching may be the best compromise currently available as regards cost effectiveness and successful information retrieval for end users
  3. Dyer, H.; Morris, A.: Human aspects of library automation (1990) 0.00
    0.0016464829 = product of:
      0.014818345 = sum of:
        0.014818345 = weight(_text_:of in 2178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014818345 = score(doc=2178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03917671 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 2178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2178)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    

Types