Moulaison Sandy, H.L.; Dykas, F.: High-quality metadata and repository staffing : perceptions of United States-based OpenDOAR participants (2016)
0.00
0.0013707994 = product of:
0.0027415988 = sum of:
0.0027415988 = product of:
0.0054831975 = sum of:
0.0054831975 = weight(_text_:a in 2806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0054831975 = score(doc=2806,freq=4.0), product of:
0.043477926 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.037706986 = queryNorm
0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 2806, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2806)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Digital repositories require good metadata, created according to community-based principles that include provisions for interoperability. When metadata is of high quality, digital objects become sharable and metadata can be harvested and reused outside of the local system. A sample of U.S.-based repository administrators from the OpenDOAR initiative were surveyed to understand aspects of the quality and creation of their metadata, and how their metadata could improve. Most respondents (65%) thought their metadata was of average quality; none thought their metadata was high quality or poor quality. The discussion argues that increased strategic staffing will alleviate many perceived issues with metadata quality.
- Type
- a
