Kim, S.H.; Eastman, C.M.: ¬An experiment on node size in a hypermedia system (1999)
0.03
0.027640268 = product of:
0.055280536 = sum of:
0.055280536 = sum of:
0.011600202 = weight(_text_:a in 3673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011600202 = score(doc=3673,freq=12.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 3673, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3673)
0.043680333 = weight(_text_:22 in 3673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043680333 = score(doc=3673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16128273 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The node size that should be used in a hypermedia system is an important design issue. 3 interpretations of node size are identified: storage (physical size), window size (presentation size), and length (logical size). an experiment in which presentation size and text length are varied in a HyperCard application is described. The experiment involves student subjects performing a fact retrieval task from a reference handbook. No interaction is found between these 2 independent variables. Performance is significantly better for the longer texts, but no significant difference is found for the 2 different window sizes
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 9:35:20
- Type
- a
