Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Edmunds, J."
  • × language_ss:"d"
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Edmunds, J.: Zombrary apocalypse!? : RDA, LRM, and the death of cataloging (2017) 0.00 
    0.0010460628 = product of:
  0.012552753 = sum of:
    0.012552753 = weight(_text_:internet in 3818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012552753 = score(doc=3818,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09621047 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032588977 = queryNorm
        0.1304718 = fieldWeight in 3818, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3818)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Abstract
    The point of this paper is not to critique RDA (a futile task, since RDA is here to stay), but to make plain that its claim to be a solution to the challenge(s) of bibliographic description in the Internet Age is unfounded, and, secondarily, to explain why such wild claims continue to be advanced and go unchallenged by the rank and file of career catalogers.