Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
- Did you mean:
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 76400 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f bibliotheksbenutzung %2f auskunft%2c information%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 73400 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f bibliotheksbenutzung %2f auskunft%2c information%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 76400 allgemeinen %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f bibliotheksbenutzung %2f auskunft%2c information%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 76400 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f bibliotheksbenutzung %2f auskunfts%2c information%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2223 76400 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f bibliotheksbenutzung %2f auskunft%2c information%22 2
-
Efron, M.: Linear time series models for term weighting in information retrieval (2010)
0.00
3.9466174E-4 = product of: 0.005919926 = sum of: 0.005919926 = product of: 0.011839852 = sum of: 0.011839852 = weight(_text_:information in 3688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.011839852 = score(doc=3688,freq=8.0), product of: 0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of: 1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218) 0.028978055 = queryNorm 0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 3688, product of: 2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of: 8.0 = termFreq=8.0 1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218) 0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3688) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
- Abstract
- Common measures of term importance in information retrieval (IR) rely on counts of term frequency; rare terms receive higher weight in document ranking than common terms receive. However, realistic scenarios yield additional information about terms in a collection. Of interest in this article is the temporal behavior of terms as a collection changes over time. We propose capturing each term's collection frequency at discrete time intervals over the lifespan of a corpus and analyzing the resulting time series. We hypothesize the collection frequency of a weakly discriminative term x at time t is predictable by a linear model of the term's prior observations. On the other hand, a linear time series model for a strong discriminators' collection frequency will yield a poor fit to the data. Operationalizing this hypothesis, we induce three time-based measures of term importance and test these against state-of-the-art term weighting models.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.7, S.1299-1312
-
Efron, M.; Winget, M.: Query polyrepresentation for ranking retrieval systems without relevance judgments (2010)
0.00
3.4178712E-4 = product of: 0.0051268064 = sum of: 0.0051268064 = product of: 0.010253613 = sum of: 0.010253613 = weight(_text_:information in 3469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.010253613 = score(doc=3469,freq=6.0), product of: 0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of: 1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218) 0.028978055 = queryNorm 0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 3469, product of: 2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of: 6.0 = termFreq=6.0 1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218) 0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3469) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
- Abstract
- Ranking information retrieval (IR) systems with respect to their effectiveness is a crucial operation during IR evaluation, as well as during data fusion. This article offers a novel method of approaching the system-ranking problem, based on the widely studied idea of polyrepresentation. The principle of polyrepresentation suggests that a single information need can be represented by many query articulations-what we call query aspects. By skimming the top k (where k is small) documents retrieved by a single system for multiple query aspects, we collect a set of documents that are likely to be relevant to a given test topic. Labeling these skimmed documents as putatively relevant lets us build pseudorelevance judgments without undue human intervention. We report experiments where using these pseudorelevance judgments delivers a rank ordering of IR systems that correlates highly with rankings based on human relevance judgments.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.6, S.1081-1091