Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Egghe, L."
  • × author_ss:"Rousseau, R."
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.; Hooydonk, G. van: Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries : consequences for evaluation studies (2000) 0.00
    0.0036413912 = product of:
      0.014565565 = sum of:
        0.014565565 = weight(_text_:information in 4384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014565565 = score(doc=4384,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 4384, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4384)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    One aim of science evaluation studies is to determine quantitatively the contribution of different players (authors, departments, countries) to the whole system. This information is then used to study the evolution of the system, for instance to gauge the results of special national or international programs. Taking articles as our basic data, we want to determine the exact relative contribution of each coauthor or each country. These numbers are brought together to obtain country scores, or department scores, etc. It turns out, as we will show in this article, that different scoring methods can yield totally different rankings. Conseqeuntly, a ranking between countries, universities, research groups or authors, based on one particular accrediting methods does not contain an absolute truth about their relative importance
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.2, S.145-157
  2. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬The influence of publication delays on the observed aging distribution of scientific literature (2000) 0.00
    0.0034331365 = product of:
      0.013732546 = sum of:
        0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 4385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013732546 = score(doc=4385,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4385, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4385)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.2, S.158-165
  3. Egghe, L.; Liang, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬A relation between h-index and impact factor in the power-law model (2009) 0.00
    0.0034331365 = product of:
      0.013732546 = sum of:
        0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 6759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013732546 = score(doc=6759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 6759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6759)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.11, S.2362-2365
  4. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬An h-index weighted by citation impact (2008) 0.00
    0.0034331365 = product of:
      0.013732546 = sum of:
        0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013732546 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.2, S.770-780
  5. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.; Rousseau, S.: TOP-curves (2007) 0.00
    0.0030039945 = product of:
      0.012015978 = sum of:
        0.012015978 = weight(_text_:information in 50) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012015978 = score(doc=50,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 50, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=50)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.6, S.777-785
  6. Egghe, L.; Liang, L.; Rousseau, R.: Fundamental properties of rhythm sequences (2008) 0.00
    0.0030039945 = product of:
      0.012015978 = sum of:
        0.012015978 = weight(_text_:information in 1965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012015978 = score(doc=1965,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 1965, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1965)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.9, S.1469-1478
  7. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Aging, obsolescence, impact, growth, and utilization : definitions and relations (2000) 0.00
    0.0025748524 = product of:
      0.01029941 = sum of:
        0.01029941 = weight(_text_:information in 5154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01029941 = score(doc=5154,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5154, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5154)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.11, S.1004-1017
  8. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬A measure for the cohesion of weighted networks (2003) 0.00
    0.0021457102 = product of:
      0.008582841 = sum of:
        0.008582841 = weight(_text_:information in 5157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008582841 = score(doc=5157,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5157, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5157)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.3, S.193-202