-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996)
0.02
0.022294745 = product of:
0.04458949 = sum of:
0.04458949 = sum of:
0.010943544 = weight(_text_:a in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010943544 = score(doc=7659,freq=18.0), product of:
0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041389145 = queryNorm
0.22931081 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.033645947 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033645947 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14493774 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041389145 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- It is possible, using ISI's Journal Citation Report (JCR), to calculate average impact factors (AIF) for LCR's subject categories but it can be more useful to know the global Impact Factor (GIF) of a subject category and compare the 2 values. Reports results of a study to compare the relationships between AIFs and GIFs of subjects, based on the particular case of the average impact factor of a subfield versus the impact factor of this subfield as a whole, the difference being studied between an average of quotients, denoted as AQ, and a global average, obtained as a quotient of averages, and denoted as GQ. In the case of impact factors, AQ becomes the average impact factor of a field, and GQ becomes its global impact factor. Discusses a number of applications of this technique in the context of informetrics and scientometrics
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.: Special features of the author - publication relationship and a new explanation of Lotka's law based on convolution theory (1994)
0.00
0.002579418 = product of:
0.005158836 = sum of:
0.005158836 = product of:
0.010317672 = sum of:
0.010317672 = weight(_text_:a in 5068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010317672 = score(doc=5068,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041389145 = queryNorm
0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 5068, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5068)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.: Little science, big science and beyond (1994)
0.00
0.0021279112 = product of:
0.0042558224 = sum of:
0.0042558224 = product of:
0.008511645 = sum of:
0.008511645 = weight(_text_:a in 6883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008511645 = score(doc=6883,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041389145 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 6883, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6883)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.: On the law of Zipf-Mandelbrot for multi-word phrases (1999)
0.00
0.001719612 = product of:
0.003439224 = sum of:
0.003439224 = product of:
0.006878448 = sum of:
0.006878448 = weight(_text_:a in 3058) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006878448 = score(doc=3058,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041389145 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 3058, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3058)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article studies the probabilities of the occurence of multi-word (m-word) phrases (m=2,3,...) in relation to the probabilities of occurence of the single words. It is well known that, in the latter case, the lae of Zipf is valid (i.e., a power law). We prove that in the case of m-word phrases (m>=2), this is not the case. We present 2 independent proof of this
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.: Mathematical theories of citation (1998)
0.00
0.001719612 = product of:
0.003439224 = sum of:
0.003439224 = product of:
0.006878448 = sum of:
0.006878448 = weight(_text_:a in 5125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006878448 = score(doc=5125,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041389145 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 5125, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5125)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Contribution to a thematic issue devoted to 'Theories of citation?'
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Duality in information retrieval and the hypegeometric distribution (1997)
0.00
0.0012159493 = product of:
0.0024318986 = sum of:
0.0024318986 = product of:
0.004863797 = sum of:
0.004863797 = weight(_text_:a in 647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004863797 = score(doc=647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.041389145 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=647)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- a