-
Egghe, L.: Note on a possible decomposition of the h-Index (2013)
0.00
0.0018048285 = product of:
0.003609657 = sum of:
0.003609657 = product of:
0.007219314 = sum of:
0.007219314 = weight(_text_:s in 683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007219314 = score(doc=683,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 683, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=683)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.4, S.871
-
Egghe, L.: ¬The Hirsch index and related impact measures (2010)
0.00
0.0018048285 = product of:
0.003609657 = sum of:
0.003609657 = product of:
0.007219314 = sum of:
0.007219314 = weight(_text_:s in 1597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007219314 = score(doc=1597,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 1597, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1597)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 44(2010) no.1, S.65-114
-
Egghe, L.: Informetric explanation of some Leiden Ranking graphs (2014)
0.00
0.0017016088 = product of:
0.0034032175 = sum of:
0.0034032175 = product of:
0.006806435 = sum of:
0.006806435 = weight(_text_:s in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006806435 = score(doc=1236,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.1359047 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The S-shaped functional relation between the mean citation score and the proportion of top 10% publications for the 500 Leiden Ranking universities is explained using results of the shifted Lotka function. Also the concave or convex relation between the proportion of top 100?% publications, for different fractions ?, is explained using the obtained new informetric model.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.4, S.737-741
-
Egghe, L.: ¬A good normalized impact and concentration measure (2014)
0.00
0.0015040238 = product of:
0.0030080476 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = product of:
0.006016095 = sum of:
0.006016095 = weight(_text_:s in 1508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006016095 = score(doc=1508,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 1508, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1508)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.10, S.2052-2054
-
Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.: Thoughts on uncitedness : Nobel laureates and Fields medalists as case studies (2011)
0.00
0.0012762066 = product of:
0.0025524131 = sum of:
0.0025524131 = product of:
0.0051048263 = sum of:
0.0051048263 = weight(_text_:s in 4994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0051048263 = score(doc=4994,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 4994, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Vgl.: Erratum. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.2, S.429.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.8, S.1637-1644
-
Egghe, L.: ¬A new short proof of Naranan's theorem, explaining Lotka's law and Zipf's law (2010)
0.00
0.0010528166 = product of:
0.0021056333 = sum of:
0.0021056333 = product of:
0.0042112665 = sum of:
0.0042112665 = weight(_text_:s in 3432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0042112665 = score(doc=3432,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3432, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3432)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.12, S.2581-2583
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬The Hirsch index of a shifted Lotka function and its relation with the impact factor (2012)
0.00
0.0010528166 = product of:
0.0021056333 = sum of:
0.0021056333 = product of:
0.0042112665 = sum of:
0.0042112665 = weight(_text_:s in 243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0042112665 = score(doc=243,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 243, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=243)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.5, S.1048-1053
-
Egghe, L.: Remarks on the paper by A. De Visscher, "what does the g-index really measure?" (2012)
0.00
0.0010528166 = product of:
0.0021056333 = sum of:
0.0021056333 = product of:
0.0042112665 = sum of:
0.0042112665 = weight(_text_:s in 463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0042112665 = score(doc=463,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 463, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=463)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.10, S.2118-2121
-
Egghe, L.: Theory of the topical coverage of multiple databases (2013)
0.00
0.0010528166 = product of:
0.0021056333 = sum of:
0.0021056333 = product of:
0.0042112665 = sum of:
0.0042112665 = weight(_text_:s in 526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0042112665 = score(doc=526,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 526, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=526)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.1, S.126-131
-
Egghe, L.: Influence of adding or deleting items and sources on the h-index (2010)
0.00
9.0241426E-4 = product of:
0.0018048285 = sum of:
0.0018048285 = product of:
0.003609657 = sum of:
0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 3336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003609657 = score(doc=3336,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3336, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3336)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.2, S.370-373
-
Egghe, L.; Guns, R.: Applications of the generalized law of Benford to informetric data (2012)
0.00
9.0241426E-4 = product of:
0.0018048285 = sum of:
0.0018048285 = product of:
0.003609657 = sum of:
0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003609657 = score(doc=376,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.8, S.1662-1665