Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Egghe, L."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Egghe, L.: ¬A good normalized impact and concentration measure (2014) 0.03
    0.025042903 = product of:
      0.050085805 = sum of:
        0.050085805 = product of:
          0.10017161 = sum of:
            0.10017161 = weight(_text_:g in 1508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10017161 = score(doc=1508,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04544495 = queryNorm
                0.5868668 = fieldWeight in 1508, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1508)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    It is shown that a normalized version of the g-index is a good normalized impact and concentration measure. A proposal for such a measure by Bartolucci is improved.
    Object
    g-index
  2. Egghe, L.: Remarks on the paper by A. De Visscher, "what does the g-index really measure?" (2012) 0.02
    0.021469817 = product of:
      0.042939633 = sum of:
        0.042939633 = product of:
          0.085879266 = sum of:
            0.085879266 = weight(_text_:g in 463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.085879266 = score(doc=463,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04544495 = queryNorm
                0.5031335 = fieldWeight in 463, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=463)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The author presents a different view on properties of impact measures than given in the paper of De Visscher (2011). He argues that a good impact measure works better when citations are concentrated rather than spread out over articles. The author also presents theoretical evidence that the g-index and the R-index can be close to the square root of the total number of citations, whereas this is not the case for the A-index. Here the author confirms an assertion of De Visscher.
    Object
    g-index