Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Egghe, L."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Egghe, L.: Note on a possible decomposition of the h-Index (2013) 0.00 
    0.0038499737 = product of:
  0.019249868 = sum of:
    0.019249868 = weight(_text_:information in 683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019249868 = score(doc=683,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047114085 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 683, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=683)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.4, S.871
  2. Egghe, L.: ¬The Hirsch index and related impact measures (2010) 0.00 
    0.0038499737 = product of:
  0.019249868 = sum of:
    0.019249868 = weight(_text_:information in 1597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019249868 = score(doc=1597,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047114085 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 1597, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1597)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 44(2010) no.1, S.65-114
  3. Egghe, L.: ¬A good normalized impact and concentration measure (2014) 0.00 
    0.0032083113 = product of:
  0.016041556 = sum of:
    0.016041556 = weight(_text_:information in 1508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016041556 = score(doc=1508,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047114085 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1508, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1508)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.10, S.2052-2054
  4. Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.: Thoughts on uncitedness : Nobel laureates and Fields medalists as case studies (2011) 0.00 
    0.0027223425 = product of:
  0.0136117125 = sum of:
    0.0136117125 = weight(_text_:information in 4994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0136117125 = score(doc=4994,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047114085 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 4994, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4994)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: Erratum. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.2, S.429.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.8, S.1637-1644
  5. Egghe, L.: Informetric explanation of some Leiden Ranking graphs (2014) 0.00 
    0.0025666493 = product of:
  0.012833246 = sum of:
    0.012833246 = weight(_text_:information in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012833246 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047114085 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.4, S.737-741
  6. Egghe, L.: ¬A new short proof of Naranan's theorem, explaining Lotka's law and Zipf's law (2010) 0.00 
    0.002245818 = product of:
  0.01122909 = sum of:
    0.01122909 = weight(_text_:information in 3432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01122909 = score(doc=3432,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047114085 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 3432, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3432)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.12, S.2581-2583
  7. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬The Hirsch index of a shifted Lotka function and its relation with the impact factor (2012) 0.00 
    0.002245818 = product of:
  0.01122909 = sum of:
    0.01122909 = weight(_text_:information in 243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01122909 = score(doc=243,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047114085 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 243, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=243)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.5, S.1048-1053
  8. Egghe, L.: Remarks on the paper by A. De Visscher, "what does the g-index really measure?" (2012) 0.00 
    0.002245818 = product of:
  0.01122909 = sum of:
    0.01122909 = weight(_text_:information in 463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01122909 = score(doc=463,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047114085 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 463, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=463)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.10, S.2118-2121
  9. Egghe, L.: Theory of the topical coverage of multiple databases (2013) 0.00 
    0.002245818 = product of:
  0.01122909 = sum of:
    0.01122909 = weight(_text_:information in 526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01122909 = score(doc=526,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047114085 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 526, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=526)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.1, S.126-131
  10. Egghe, L.: Influence of adding or deleting items and sources on the h-index (2010) 0.00 
    0.0019249868 = product of:
  0.009624934 = sum of:
    0.009624934 = weight(_text_:information in 3336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009624934 = score(doc=3336,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047114085 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3336, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3336)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.2, S.370-373
  11. Egghe, L.; Guns, R.: Applications of the generalized law of Benford to informetric data (2012) 0.00 
    0.0019249868 = product of:
  0.009624934 = sum of:
    0.009624934 = weight(_text_:information in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009624934 = score(doc=376,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08270773 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047114085 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.8, S.1662-1665

Authors