Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

0.008306145 = product of:
  0.01661229 = sum of:
    0.01661229 = product of:
      0.049836867 = sum of:
        0.049836867 = weight(_text_:m in 3058) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049836867 = score(doc=3058,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04552693 = queryNorm
            0.4398997 = fieldWeight in 3058, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3058)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This article studies the probabilities of the occurence of multi-word (m-word) phrases (m=2,3,...) in relation to the probabilities of occurence of the single words. It is well known that, in the latter case, the lae of Zipf is valid (i.e., a power law). We prove that in the case of m-word phrases (m>=2), this is not the case. We present 2 independent proof of this

0.0061682705 = product of:
  0.012336541 = sum of:
    0.012336541 = product of:
      0.037009623 = sum of:
        0.037009623 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037009623 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15942755 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04552693 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170