Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Egghe, L."
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.; Leuven, K.U.: Erratum (2012) 0.02 
    0.023390204 = product of:
  0.046780407 = sum of:
    0.046780407 = product of:
      0.07017061 = sum of:
        0.008418347 = weight(_text_:s in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008418347 = score(doc=4992,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04955441 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04557827 = queryNorm
            0.16988087 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
        0.061752263 = weight(_text_:22 in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061752263 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15960734 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04557827 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    14. 2.2012 12:53:22
    Footnote
    This article corrects: Thoughts on uncitedness: Nobel laureates and Fields medalists as case studies in: JASIST 62(2011) no,8, S.1637-1644.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.2, S.429
  2. Egghe, L.: Influence of adding or deleting items and sources on the h-index (2010) 0.01 
    0.0113591775 = product of:
  0.022718355 = sum of:
    0.022718355 = product of:
      0.034077533 = sum of:
        0.0035716018 = weight(_text_:s in 3336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0035716018 = score(doc=3336,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04955441 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04557827 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3336, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3336)
        0.03050593 = weight(_text_:j in 3336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03050593 = score(doc=3336,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14482479 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04557827 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 3336, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3336)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Adding or deleting items such as self-citations has an influence on the h-index of an author. This influence will be proved mathematically in this article. We hereby prove the experimental finding in E. Gianoli and M.A. Molina-Montenegro ([2009]) that the influence of adding or deleting self-citations on the h-index is greater for low values of the h-index. Why this is logical also is shown by a simple theoretical example. Adding or deleting sources such as adding or deleting minor contributions of an author also has an influence on the h-index of this author; this influence is modeled in this article. This model explains some practical examples found in X. Hu, R. Rousseau, and J. Chen (in press).
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.2, S.370-373
  3. Egghe, L.: Note on a possible decomposition of the h-Index (2013) 0.00 
    0.001190534 = product of:
  0.002381068 = sum of:
    0.002381068 = product of:
      0.0071432036 = sum of:
        0.0071432036 = weight(_text_:s in 683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071432036 = score(doc=683,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04955441 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04557827 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 683, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=683)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.4, S.871
  4. Egghe, L.: ¬The Hirsch index and related impact measures (2010) 0.00 
    0.001190534 = product of:
  0.002381068 = sum of:
    0.002381068 = product of:
      0.0071432036 = sum of:
        0.0071432036 = weight(_text_:s in 1597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071432036 = score(doc=1597,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04955441 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04557827 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 1597, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1597)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 44(2010) no.1, S.65-114
  5. Egghe, L.: Informetric explanation of some Leiden Ranking graphs (2014) 0.00 
    0.0011224463 = product of:
  0.0022448925 = sum of:
    0.0022448925 = product of:
      0.0067346776 = sum of:
        0.0067346776 = weight(_text_:s in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0067346776 = score(doc=1236,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04955441 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04557827 = queryNorm
            0.1359047 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The S-shaped functional relation between the mean citation score and the proportion of top 10% publications for the 500 Leiden Ranking universities is explained using results of the shifted Lotka function. Also the concave or convex relation between the proportion of top 100?% publications, for different fractions ?, is explained using the obtained new informetric model.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.4, S.737-741
  6. Egghe, L.: ¬A good normalized impact and concentration measure (2014) 0.00 
    9.921116E-4 = product of:
  0.0019842233 = sum of:
    0.0019842233 = product of:
      0.00595267 = sum of:
        0.00595267 = weight(_text_:s in 1508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00595267 = score(doc=1508,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04955441 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04557827 = queryNorm
            0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 1508, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1508)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.10, S.2052-2054
  7. Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.: Thoughts on uncitedness : Nobel laureates and Fields medalists as case studies (2011) 0.00 
    8.418347E-4 = product of:
  0.0016836694 = sum of:
    0.0016836694 = product of:
      0.005051008 = sum of:
        0.005051008 = weight(_text_:s in 4994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005051008 = score(doc=4994,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04955441 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04557827 = queryNorm
            0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 4994, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4994)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: Erratum. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.2, S.429.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.8, S.1637-1644
  8. Egghe, L.: On the relation between the association strength and other similarity measures (2010) 0.00 
    7.9368934E-4 = product of:
  0.0015873787 = sum of:
    0.0015873787 = product of:
      0.004762136 = sum of:
        0.004762136 = weight(_text_:s in 3598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004762136 = score(doc=3598,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04955441 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04557827 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 3598, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3598)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.7, S.1502-1504
  9. Egghe, L.: ¬A new short proof of Naranan's theorem, explaining Lotka's law and Zipf's law (2010) 0.00 
    6.9447816E-4 = product of:
  0.0013889563 = sum of:
    0.0013889563 = product of:
      0.004166869 = sum of:
        0.004166869 = weight(_text_:s in 3432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004166869 = score(doc=3432,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04955441 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04557827 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3432, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3432)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.12, S.2581-2583
  10. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬The Hirsch index of a shifted Lotka function and its relation with the impact factor (2012) 0.00 
    6.9447816E-4 = product of:
  0.0013889563 = sum of:
    0.0013889563 = product of:
      0.004166869 = sum of:
        0.004166869 = weight(_text_:s in 243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004166869 = score(doc=243,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04955441 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04557827 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 243, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=243)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.5, S.1048-1053
  11. Egghe, L.: Remarks on the paper by A. De Visscher, "what does the g-index really measure?" (2012) 0.00 
    6.9447816E-4 = product of:
  0.0013889563 = sum of:
    0.0013889563 = product of:
      0.004166869 = sum of:
        0.004166869 = weight(_text_:s in 463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004166869 = score(doc=463,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04955441 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04557827 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 463, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=463)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.10, S.2118-2121
  12. Egghe, L.: Theory of the topical coverage of multiple databases (2013) 0.00 
    6.9447816E-4 = product of:
  0.0013889563 = sum of:
    0.0013889563 = product of:
      0.004166869 = sum of:
        0.004166869 = weight(_text_:s in 526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004166869 = score(doc=526,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04955441 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04557827 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 526, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=526)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.1, S.126-131
  13. Egghe, L.; Bornmann, L.: Fallout and miss in journal peer review (2013) 0.00 
    6.9447816E-4 = product of:
  0.0013889563 = sum of:
    0.0013889563 = product of:
      0.004166869 = sum of:
        0.004166869 = weight(_text_:s in 1759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004166869 = score(doc=1759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04955441 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04557827 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1759)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 69(2013) no.3, S.411-416
  14. Egghe, L.: Good properties of similarity measures and their complementarity (2010) 0.00 
    5.95267E-4 = product of:
  0.001190534 = sum of:
    0.001190534 = product of:
      0.0035716018 = sum of:
        0.0035716018 = weight(_text_:s in 3993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0035716018 = score(doc=3993,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04955441 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04557827 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3993, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3993)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.10, S.2151-2160
  15. Egghe, L.; Guns, R.: Applications of the generalized law of Benford to informetric data (2012) 0.00 
    5.95267E-4 = product of:
  0.001190534 = sum of:
    0.001190534 = product of:
      0.0035716018 = sum of:
        0.0035716018 = weight(_text_:s in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0035716018 = score(doc=376,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04955441 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04557827 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.8, S.1662-1665

Authors

Themes