Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Egghe, L."
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Egghe, L.: ¬A good normalized impact and concentration measure (2014) 0.02 
    0.020592602 = product of:
  0.041185204 = sum of:
    0.041185204 = product of:
      0.08237041 = sum of:
        0.08237041 = weight(_text_:g in 1508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08237041 = score(doc=1508,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14035623 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03736906 = queryNorm
            0.5868668 = fieldWeight in 1508, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1508)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    It is shown that a normalized version of the g-index is a good normalized impact and concentration measure. A proposal for such a measure by Bartolucci is improved.
    Object
    g-index
  2. Egghe, L.: Remarks on the paper by A. De Visscher, "what does the g-index really measure?" (2012) 0.02 
    0.017654479 = product of:
  0.035308957 = sum of:
    0.035308957 = product of:
      0.070617914 = sum of:
        0.070617914 = weight(_text_:g in 463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070617914 = score(doc=463,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14035623 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03736906 = queryNorm
            0.5031335 = fieldWeight in 463, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=463)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The author presents a different view on properties of impact measures than given in the paper of De Visscher (2011). He argues that a good impact measure works better when citations are concentrated rather than spread out over articles. The author also presents theoretical evidence that the g-index and the R-index can be close to the square root of the total number of citations, whereas this is not the case for the A-index. Here the author confirms an assertion of De Visscher.
    Object
    g-index
  3. Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.; Leuven, K.U.: Erratum (2012) 0.01 
    0.01265748 = product of:
  0.02531496 = sum of:
    0.02531496 = product of:
      0.05062992 = sum of:
        0.05062992 = weight(_text_:22 in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05062992 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13086009 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03736906 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    14. 2.2012 12:53:22

Authors