Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Elliker, C."
  1. Lancaster, F.W.; Elliker, C.; Connell, T.H.: Subject analysis (1989) 0.00
    0.00270615 = product of:
      0.0054123 = sum of:
        0.0054123 = product of:
          0.0108246 = sum of:
            0.0108246 = weight(_text_:a in 338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0108246 = score(doc=338,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 338, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=338)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  2. Elliker, C.: Classification schemes for scores : analysis of structural levels (1994) 0.00
    0.001913537 = product of:
      0.003827074 = sum of:
        0.003827074 = product of:
          0.007654148 = sum of:
            0.007654148 = weight(_text_:a in 601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007654148 = score(doc=601,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 601, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=601)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Seeks to answer 2 questions: Are there other elements in musical scores besides forms and genres and/or instrumentation that permit bibliographic organization?, and, Have library classification schemes discovered such elements and developed methods of applying them? Investigates a wide range of schemes to answer the second question, including Dewey, UDC, Bibliographical Classification and Colon Classification. Concludes that the traditional arrangement of MEDIUM + FORM/GENRE + CHARACTER continues to achieve widespread application and that this formula may be increasing in dominance
    Type
    a