Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Elliker, C."
  1. Lancaster, F.W.; Elliker, C.; Connell, T.H.: Subject analysis (1989) 0.00 
    0.0035395343 = product of:
  0.010618603 = sum of:
    0.010618603 = weight(_text_:a in 338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010618603 = score(doc=338,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 338, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=338)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Type
    a
  2. Elliker, C.: Classification schemes for scores : analysis of structural levels (1994) 0.00 
    0.0025028288 = product of:
  0.0075084865 = sum of:
    0.0075084865 = weight(_text_:a in 601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0075084865 = score(doc=601,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 601, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=601)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Seeks to answer 2 questions: Are there other elements in musical scores besides forms and genres and/or instrumentation that permit bibliographic organization?, and, Have library classification schemes discovered such elements and developed methods of applying them? Investigates a wide range of schemes to answer the second question, including Dewey, UDC, Bibliographical Classification and Colon Classification. Concludes that the traditional arrangement of MEDIUM + FORM/GENRE + CHARACTER continues to achieve widespread application and that this formula may be increasing in dominance
    Type
    a

Authors

Years