Endres-Niggemeyer, B.; Maier, E.; Sigel, A.: How to implement a naturalistic model of abstracting : four core working steps of an expert abstractor (1995)
0.01
0.0070011937 = product of:
0.017502984 = sum of:
0.011881399 = weight(_text_:a in 2930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011881399 = score(doc=2930,freq=12.0), product of:
0.054392863 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.047173154 = queryNorm
0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 2930, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2930)
0.0056215846 = product of:
0.011243169 = sum of:
0.011243169 = weight(_text_:information in 2930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011243169 = score(doc=2930,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08281143 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047173154 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2930, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2930)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- 4 working steps taken from a comprehensive empirical model of expert abstracting are studied in order to prepare an explorative implementation of a simulation model. It aims at explaining the knowledge processing activities during professional summarizing. Following the case-based and holistic strategy of qualitative empirical research, the main features of the simulation system were developed by investigating in detail a small but central test case - 4 working steps where an expert abstractor discovers what the paper is about and drafts the topic sentence of the abstract
- Source
- Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.631-674
- Type
- a