Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Endres-Niggemeyer, B."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: Content analysis : a special case of text compression (1989) 0.01 
    0.007876435 = product of:
  0.019691087 = sum of:
    0.011797264 = weight(_text_:a in 3549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011797264 = score(doc=3549,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 3549, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3549)
    0.007893822 = product of:
      0.015787644 = sum of:
        0.015787644 = weight(_text_:information in 3549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015787644 = score(doc=3549,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3549, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3549)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Presents a theoretical model, based on the Flower/Hayes model of expository writing, of the process involved in content analysis for abstracting and indexing.
    Source
    Information, knowledge, evolution. Proceedings of the 44th FID Congress, Helsinki, 28.8.-1.9.1988. Ed. by S. Koshiala and R. Launo
    Type
    a
  2. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.; Schmidt, B.: Knowledge based classification systems : basic issues, a toy system and further prospects (1989) 0.01 
    0.0068851607 = product of:
  0.017212901 = sum of:
    0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010897844 = score(doc=720,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046368346 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 720, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=720)
    0.006315058 = product of:
      0.012630116 = sum of:
        0.012630116 = weight(_text_:information in 720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012630116 = score(doc=720,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 720, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=720)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This article propagates expert systems for classification by (1) explaining the conceptual affinity (especially) between faceted classification schemes and frame representations, using a simple example and a toy system for demonstration purposes, (2) reviewing some approaches to classificational knowledge processing, both from Artificial Intelligence and Classification Research or Information Science, in order to prepare the ground for the development of more comprehensive systems: expert systems for classification
    Type
    a

Themes