Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Engels, T.C.E."
  1. Kulczycki, E.; Guns, R.; Pölönen, J.; Engels, T.C.E.; Rozkosz, E.A.; Zuccala, A.A.; Bruun, K.; Eskola, O.; Starcic, A.I.; Petr, M.; Sivertsen, G.: Multilingual publishing in the social sciences and humanities : a seven-country European study (2020) 0.02 
    0.019879285 = product of:
  0.09939642 = sum of:
    0.09939642 = weight(_text_:publishing in 11) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09939642 = score(doc=11,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.21262453 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043520276 = queryNorm
        0.46747392 = fieldWeight in 11, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=11)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    We investigate the state of multilingualism across the social sciences and humanities (SSH) using a comprehensive data set of research outputs from seven European countries (Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, Flanders [Belgium], Norway, Poland, and Slovenia). Although English tends to be the dominant language of science, SSH researchers often produce culturally and societally relevant work in their local languages. We collected and analyzed a set of 164,218 peer-reviewed journal articles (produced by 51,063 researchers from 2013 to 2015) and found that multilingualism is prevalent despite geographical location and field. Among the researchers who published at least three journal articles during this time period, over one-third from the various countries had written their work in at least two languages. The highest share of researchers who published in only one language were from Flanders (80.9%), whereas the lowest shares were from Slovenia (57.2%) and Poland (59.3%). Our findings show that multilingual publishing is an ongoing practice in many SSH research fields regardless of geographical location, political situation, and/or historical heritage. Here we argue that research is international, but multilingual publishing keeps locally relevant research alive with the added potential for creating impact.
  2. Ossenblok, T.L.B.; Verleysen, F.T.; Engels, T.C.E.: Coauthorship of journal articles and book chapters in the social sciences and humanities (2000-2010) (2014) 0.02 
    0.019477641 = product of:
  0.09738821 = sum of:
    0.09738821 = weight(_text_:publishing in 1249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09738821 = score(doc=1249,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.21262453 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043520276 = queryNorm
        0.45802903 = fieldWeight in 1249, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1249)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This study analyzes coauthorship patterns in the social sciences and humanities (SSH) for the period 2000 to 2010. The basis for the analysis is the Flemish Academic Bibliographic Database for the Social Sciences and Humanities (VABB-SHW), a comprehensive bibliographic database of peer-reviewed publications in the SSH by researchers affiliated with Flemish universities. Combining data on journal articles and book chapters, our findings indicate that collaborative publishing in the SSH is increasing, though considerable differences between disciplines remain. Conversely, we did observe a sharp decline in single-author publishing. We further demonstrate that coauthored SSH articles in journals indexed in the Web of Science (WoS) generally have a higher (and growing) number of coauthors than do either those in non-WoS journals or book chapters. This illustrates the need to include non-WoS data and book chapters when studying coauthorship in the SSH.
  3. Verleysen, F.T.; Engels, T.C.E.: ¬A label for peer-reviewed books (2013) 0.02 
    0.018363697 = product of:
  0.09181848 = sum of:
    0.09181848 = weight(_text_:publishing in 404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09181848 = score(doc=404,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21262453 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043520276 = queryNorm
        0.4318339 = fieldWeight in 404, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=404)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The Publishers Association of Flanders, Belgium, has created a label for peer-reviewed books: the Guaranteed Peer Reviewed Content (GPRC) label (www.gprc.be/en). We introduce the label and the logic behind it. A label for peer-reviewed books encourages transparency in academic book publishing. It is especially relevant for the social sciences and humanities and in the context of performance-based funding of university research.

Authors

Years

Themes