Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

Did you mean:
precises%3a%2fdocuments %2f author %26 descriptive cataloguing %2f rules%3a anglo %2f american cataloguing rules %2f 2nd ed.%22 2
precises%3a%2f_documents %2f author %26 descriptive cataloguing %2f rules%3a anglo %2f american cataloguing rules %2f 2nd ed.%22 2
precises%3a%2fdocuments %2f author %26 descriptive cataloguing %2f rules%3a angle %2f american cataloguing rules %2f 2nd ed.%22 2
precises%3a%2fdocuments %2f author %26 deskriptive cataloguing %2f rules%3a anglo %2f american cataloguing rules %2f 2nd ed.%22 2
precises%3a%2f_documents %2f author %26 deskriptive cataloguing %2f rules%3a anglo %2f american cataloguing rules %2f 2nd ed.%22 2

Ercegovac, Z.: Proposed definitional conditions as a basis to study the concept of map author (1990) 0.01
```
0.005836024 = product of:
  0.09337638 = sum of:
    0.09337638 = weight(_text_:author in 6391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09337638 = score(doc=6391,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.6030949 = fieldWeight in 6391, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6391)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
```
Abstract

This paper describes an empirical project designed to examine the following questions: (i) what constitutes the concept of "map author," and (ii) of the responsibility functions appearing in a sample of 178 maps under consideration, which responsibility functions participate significantly in the process of map-making? This study, exploratory in nature, considered single-sheet maps produced by three U.S. publishers after 1981 as found in the OCLC online database, retrieved, and examined by the investigator.

Ercegovac, Z.: Minimal level cataloging : what does it mean for maps in the contexts of card catalogs, online catalogs, and digital libraries? (1998) 0.00

0.0015454589 = product of:
  0.024727343 = sum of:
    0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024727343 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)

Source: Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(1998) no.8, S.706-719