Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

Did you mean:
precises%3a%2fdocuments %2f subject classification schemes%3a bliss%2c henry evelyn %2f bliss bibliographic classification %2f texts%22 1
precises%3a%2f_documents %2f subject classification schemes%3a bliss%2c henry evelyn %2f bliss bibliographic classification %2f texts%22 1
precises%3a%2fdocuments %2f subject classification schemes%3a bliss%2c heery evelyn %2f bliss bibliographic classification %2f texts%22 1
precises%3a%2fdocuments %2f subject classification schemes%3a bliss%2c henry evelyn %2f bloss bibliographic classification %2f texts%22 1
precises%3a%2fdocuments %2f subject classification schemes%3a bloss%2c henry evelyn %2f bliss bibliographic classification %2f texts%22 1

Estivill, A.: IFLA study on functional requirements for bibliographic records : comments on the study (1995) 0.00
```
0.0049761366 = product of:
  0.06966591 = sum of:
    0.06966591 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06966591 = score(doc=3082,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03002521 = queryNorm
        0.5959982 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
```
Abstract

Reviews traditional catalogue and bibliographic functions and is expanded to included databases and machine readable records. Structured databases support 4 functions: finding, relating, choice and displaying. The relating and display functions of today's catalogues have not been successfully achieved. Discusses the relating and displaying functions and the study's contributions to their improvement

Source

International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 24(1995) no.3, S.44-45