Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Fairthorne, R.A."
  1. Fairthorne, R.A.: Temporal structure in bibliographic classification (1985) 0.02
    0.020628467 = sum of:
      0.019206518 = product of:
        0.07682607 = sum of:
          0.07682607 = weight(_text_:author's in 3651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07682607 = score(doc=3651,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3449079 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05132441 = queryNorm
              0.22274372 = fieldWeight in 3651, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3651)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.0014219495 = product of:
        0.002843899 = sum of:
          0.002843899 = weight(_text_:s in 3651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.002843899 = score(doc=3651,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.055801827 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05132441 = queryNorm
              0.050964262 = fieldWeight in 3651, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3651)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper, presented at the Ottawa Conference an the Conceptual Basis of the Classification of Knowledge, in 1971, is one of Fairthorne's more perceptive works and deserves a wide audience, especially as it breaks new ground in classification theory. In discussing the notion of discourse, he makes a "distinction between what discourse mentions and what discourse is about" [emphasis added], considered as a "fundamental factor to the relativistic nature of bibliographic classification" (p. 360). A table of mathematical functions, for example, describes exactly something represented by a collection of digits, but, without a preface, this table does not fit into a broader context. Some indication of the author's intent ls needed to fit the table into a broader context. This intent may appear in a title, chapter heading, class number or some other aid. Discourse an and discourse about something "cannot be determined solely from what it mentions" (p. 361). Some kind of background is needed. Fairthorne further develops the theme that knowledge about a subject comes from previous knowledge, thus adding a temporal factor to classification. "Some extra textual criteria are needed" in order to classify (p. 362). For example, "documents that mention the same things, but are an different topics, will have different ancestors, in the sense of preceding documents to which they are linked by various bibliographic characteristics ... [and] ... they will have different descendants" (p. 363). The classifier has to distinguish between documents that "mention exactly the same thing" but are not about the same thing. The classifier does this by classifying "sets of documents that form their histories, their bibliographic world lines" (p. 363). The practice of citation is one method of performing the linking and presents a "fan" of documents connected by a chain of citations to past work. The fan is seen as the effect of generations of documents - each generation connected to the previous one, and all ancestral to the present document. Thus, there are levels in temporal structure-that is, antecedent and successor documents-and these require that documents be identified in relation to other documents. This gives a set of documents an "irrevocable order," a loose order which Fairthorne calls "bibliographic time," and which is "generated by the fact of continual growth" (p. 364). He does not consider "bibliographic time" to be an equivalent to physical time because bibliographic events, as part of communication, require delay. Sets of documents, as indicated above, rather than single works, are used in classification. While an event, a person, a unique feature of the environment, may create a class of one-such as the French Revolution, Napoleon, Niagara Falls-revolutions, emperors, and waterfalls are sets which, as sets, will subsume individuals and make normal classes.
    Footnote
    Original in: Ottawa Conference on the Conceptual Basis of the Classification of Knowledge, Ottawa, 1971. Ed.: Jerzy A Wojceichowski. Pullach: Verlag Dokumentation 1974. S.404-412.
    Pages
    S.356-368
  2. Fairthorne, R.A.: Empirical hyperbolic distributions (Bradford-Zipf-Mandelbrot) for bibliometric description and prediction (1969) 0.00
    0.002843899 = product of:
      0.005687798 = sum of:
        0.005687798 = product of:
          0.011375596 = sum of:
            0.011375596 = weight(_text_:s in 4329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011375596 = score(doc=4329,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.055801827 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05132441 = queryNorm
                0.20385705 = fieldWeight in 4329, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4329)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Wiederabdruck in: Journal of documentation. 61(2005) no.2, S.171-193.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 25(1969), S.319-343
  3. Fairthorne, R.A.: Towards information retrieval (1961) 0.00
    0.0026812535 = product of:
      0.005362507 = sum of:
        0.005362507 = product of:
          0.010725014 = sum of:
            0.010725014 = weight(_text_:s in 1651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010725014 = score(doc=1651,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.055801827 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05132441 = queryNorm
                0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 1651, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1651)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: J. Doc. 18(1962) S.91-94.
  4. Fairthorne, R.A.: Content analysis, specification, and control (1969) 0.00
    0.0026812535 = product of:
      0.005362507 = sum of:
        0.005362507 = product of:
          0.010725014 = sum of:
            0.010725014 = weight(_text_:s in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010725014 = score(doc=238,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.055801827 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05132441 = queryNorm
                0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 4(1969), S.73-110
  5. Fairthorne, R.A.: 'Browsing' schemes and 'specialist' schemes (1969) 0.00
    0.0023460968 = product of:
      0.0046921936 = sum of:
        0.0046921936 = product of:
          0.009384387 = sum of:
            0.009384387 = weight(_text_:s in 1280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009384387 = score(doc=1280,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.055801827 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05132441 = queryNorm
                0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 1280, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1280)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.9-11
  6. Fairthorne, R.A.: ¬The symmetries of ignorance (1973) 0.00
    0.0023460968 = product of:
      0.0046921936 = sum of:
        0.0046921936 = product of:
          0.009384387 = sum of:
            0.009384387 = weight(_text_:s in 1449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009384387 = score(doc=1449,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.055801827 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05132441 = queryNorm
                0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 1449, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1449)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.262-267
  7. Fairthorne, R.A.: Bradford's law and perspective (1980) 0.00
    0.00201094 = product of:
      0.00402188 = sum of:
        0.00402188 = product of:
          0.00804376 = sum of:
            0.00804376 = weight(_text_:s in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00804376 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.055801827 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05132441 = queryNorm
                0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.101-105
  8. Fairthorne, R.A.: Temporal structure in bibliographic classification (1978) 0.00
    0.0018959326 = product of:
      0.0037918652 = sum of:
        0.0037918652 = product of:
          0.0075837304 = sum of:
            0.0075837304 = weight(_text_:s in 1650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0075837304 = score(doc=1650,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.055801827 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05132441 = queryNorm
                0.1359047 = fieldWeight in 1650, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1650)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Zusammenfassung von P.A. Richmond (S.413-415) "This is one of the most interesting papers to come along in many a moon"
    Pages
    S.404-412
  9. Fairthorne, R.A.: Empirical hyperbolic distributions (Bradford-Zipf-Mandelbrot) for bibliometric description and prediction (2005) 0.00
    0.0016589412 = product of:
      0.0033178823 = sum of:
        0.0033178823 = product of:
          0.0066357646 = sum of:
            0.0066357646 = weight(_text_:s in 3776) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0066357646 = score(doc=3776,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.055801827 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05132441 = queryNorm
                0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 3776, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3776)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - Aims to build on the work of Buckland and Hindle regarding statistical distribution as applied to the field of bibliometrics, particularly the use of empirical laws. Design/methodology/approach - Gives examples of hyperbolic distributions that have a bearing on the bibliometric application, and discusses the characteristics of hyperbolic distributions and the Bradford distribution. Findings - Hyperbolic distributions are the inevitable result of combinatorial necessity and a tendency to short-term rational behaviour. Originality/value - Supports Bradford's conclusion from his law, i.e. that to know about one's speciality, one must go outside it. Wiederabdruck eines Artikels aus Journal of documentation 25(1969) no.4, S.319-343.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 61(2005) no.2, S.171-193