Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

Did you mean:
rvk_ss%3a%21st 230 %5BInformatik %23 monographien %23 software und -entwicklung %23 software allgemein%2c %28Einf%c3%bahnung%2c lehre%c3%bücher%2c methoden der programmierung%29 software engineering%2c programmentwicklungssysteme%2c softwarewerkzeuge%5d%22 2
rvk_ss%3a%21st 230 %5BInformatik %23 monographien %23 software und -entwicklung %23 software allgemein%2c %28Einf%c3%bahnung%2c lehre%c3%bucher%2c methoden der programmierung%29 software engineering%2c programmentwicklungssysteme%2c softwarewerkzeuge%5d%22 2
rvk_ss%3a%21st 230 %5BInformatik %23 monographien %23 software und -entwicklung %23 software allgemein%2c %28Einf%c3%bahnung%2c lehre%c3%bücher%2c methoden der programmierung%29 software engineering%2c programmentwicklungssysteme%2c softwarewerkzeugen%5d%22 2
rvk_ss%3a%21st 230 %5BInformatik %23 monographien %23 software und -entwicklung %23 software allgemein%2c %28Einf%c3%bahnung%2c lehrt%c3%bücher%2c methoden der programmierung%29 software engineering%2c programmentwicklungssysteme%2c softwarewerkzeuge%5d%22 2
rvk_ss%3a%21st 230 %5BInformatik %23 monographien %23 software und -entwicklung %23 software allgemein%2c %28Einf%c3%buchung%2c lehre%c3%bücher%2c methoden der programmierung%29 software engineering%2c programmentwicklungssysteme%2c softwarewerkzeuge%5d%22 2

Fang, H.: ¬A discussion of citations from the perspective of the contribution of the cited paper to the citing paper (2018) 0.01

0.006430729 = product of:
  0.042871524 = sum of:
    0.014290508 = weight(_text_:23 in 4453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014290508 = score(doc=4453,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 4453, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4453)
    0.014290508 = weight(_text_:23 in 4453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014290508 = score(doc=4453,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 4453, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4453)
    0.014290508 = weight(_text_:23 in 4453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014290508 = score(doc=4453,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.1979932 = fieldWeight in 4453, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4453)
  0.15 = coord(3/20)

Date: 9.12.2018 16:37:23

Chen, L.; Fang, H.: ¬An automatic method for ex-tracting innovative ideas based on the Scopus® database (2019) 0.00
```
8.027764E-4 = product of:
  0.016055528 = sum of:
    0.016055528 = product of:
      0.032111056 = sum of:
        0.032111056 = weight(_text_:engineering in 5310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032111056 = score(doc=5310,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10819342 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.29679304 = fieldWeight in 5310, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5310)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.05 = coord(1/20)
```
Abstract

The novelty of knowledge claims in a research paper can be considered an evaluation criterion for papers to supplement citations. To provide a foundation for research evaluation from the perspective of innovativeness, we propose an automatic approach for extracting innovative ideas from the abstracts of technology and engineering papers. The approach extracts N-grams as candidates based on part-of-speech tagging and determines whether they are novel by checking the Scopus® database to determine whether they had ever been presented previously. Moreover, we discussed the distributions of innovative ideas in different abstract structures. To improve the performance by excluding noisy N-grams, a list of stopwords and a list of research description characteristics were developed. We selected abstracts of articles published from 2011 to 2017 with the topic of semantic analysis as the experimental texts. Excluding noisy N-grams, considering the distribution of innovative ideas in abstracts, and suitably combining N-grams can effectively improve the performance of automatic innovative idea extraction. Unlike co-word and co-citation analysis, innovative-idea extraction aims to identify the differences in a paper from all previously published papers.