Fassbender, J.: ¬Die Register des Buchinhalts : Register oder Konkordanz (2011)
0.01
0.00846692 = product of:
0.063501894 = sum of:
0.009365354 = weight(_text_:und in 4905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009365354 = score(doc=4905,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 4905, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4905)
0.009365354 = weight(_text_:und in 4905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009365354 = score(doc=4905,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 4905, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4905)
0.042517517 = weight(_text_:deutsche in 4905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042517517 = score(doc=4905,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10186133 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.41740587 = fieldWeight in 4905, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4905)
0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 4905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002253667 = score(doc=4905,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4905, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4905)
0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
- Abstract
- Angesichts der wachsenden Zahl von Fachbüchern, die entweder gar kein Sachregister haben oder deren Register nur von schlechter bis indiskutabeler Qualität sind - z. B. automatisch erzeugte Konkordanzen oder eingebettete Register (Index-Marken im Text mit oft übersehenen Nachteilen für die Qualität) -, sieht sich das Deutsche Netzwerk der Indexer zu einem Plädoyer für gute Register veranlasst.
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 62(2011) H.6/7, S.322
