Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Fischer, D.H."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  1. Fischer, D.H.; Möhr, W.; Rostek, L.: ¬A modular, object-oriented and generic approach for building terminology maintenance systems (1996) 0.00 
    0.0014232727 = product of:
  0.016367635 = sum of:
    0.007674677 = weight(_text_:und in 6345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007674677 = score(doc=6345,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 6345, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6345)
    0.008692958 = product of:
      0.017385917 = sum of:
        0.017385917 = weight(_text_:international in 6345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017385917 = score(doc=6345,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.22113968 = fieldWeight in 6345, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6345)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    Source
    TKE'96: Terminology and knowledge engineering. Proceedings 4th International Congress on Terminology and Knowledge Engineering, 26.-28.8.1996, Wien. Ed.: C. Galinski u. K.-D. Schmitz
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  2. Fischer, D.H.: From thesauri towards ontologies? (1998) 0.00 
    0.0014232727 = product of:
  0.016367635 = sum of:
    0.007674677 = weight(_text_:und in 2176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007674677 = score(doc=2176,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 2176, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2176)
    0.008692958 = product of:
      0.017385917 = sum of:
        0.017385917 = weight(_text_:international in 2176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017385917 = score(doc=2176,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.22113968 = fieldWeight in 2176, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2176)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    Source
    Structures and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 5th International ISKO-Conference, Lille, 25.-29.8.1998. Ed.: W. Mustafa el Hadi et al
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  3. Fischer, D.H.: Converting a thesaurus to OWL : Notes on the paper "The National Cancer Institute's Thesaurus and Ontology" (2004) 0.00 
    0.0010225547 = product of:
  0.011759379 = sum of:
    0.004476895 = weight(_text_:und in 2362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004476895 = score(doc=2362,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.085706696 = fieldWeight in 2362, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2362)
    0.007282484 = weight(_text_:im in 2362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007282484 = score(doc=2362,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.023567878 = queryNorm
        0.10931155 = fieldWeight in 2362, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2362)
  0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    Abstract
    The paper analysed here is a kind of position paper. In order to get a better under-standing of the reported work I used the retrieval interface of the thesaurus, the so-called NCI DTS Browser accessible via the Web3, and I perused the cited OWL file4 with numerous "Find" and "Find next" string searches. In addition the file was im-ported into Protégé 2000, Release 2.0, with OWL Plugin 1.0 and Racer Plugin 1.7.14. At the end of the paper's introduction the authors say: "In the following sections, this paper will describe the terminology development process at NCI, and the issues associated with converting a description logic based nomenclature to a semantically rich OWL ontology." While I will not deal with the first part, i.e. the terminology development process at NCI, I do not see the thesaurus as a description logic based nomenclature, or its cur-rent state and conversion already result in a "rich" OWL ontology. What does "rich" mean here? According to my view there is a great quantity of concepts and links but a very poor description logic structure which enables inferences. And what does the fol-lowing really mean, which is said a few lines previously: "Although editors have defined a number of named ontologic relations to support the description-logic based structure of the Thesaurus, additional relation-ships are considered for inclusion as required to support dependent applications."
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus

Authors

Years

Types