Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Fischer, D.H."
  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  1. Rostek, L.; Fischer, D.H.: Objektorientierte Modellierung eines Thesaurus auf der Basis eines Frame-Systems mit graphischer Benutzerschnittstelle (1988) 0.03 
    0.030734384 = product of:
  0.15367192 = sum of:
    0.15367192 = sum of:
      0.043173548 = weight(_text_:h in 23) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043173548 = score(doc=23,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.11234521 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045219366 = queryNorm
          0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 23, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=23)
      0.11049837 = weight(_text_:l in 23) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11049837 = score(doc=23,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17973126 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045219366 = queryNorm
          0.6147977 = fieldWeight in 23, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=23)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 39(1988) H.4, S.217-226
  2. Fischer, D.H.; Möhr, W.; Rostek, L.: ¬A modular, object-oriented and generic approach for building terminology maintenance systems (1996) 0.02 
    0.022327587 = product of:
  0.055818968 = sum of:
    0.032140747 = weight(_text_:u in 6345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032140747 = score(doc=6345,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1480683 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045219366 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 6345, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6345)
    0.02367822 = product of:
      0.04735644 = sum of:
        0.04735644 = weight(_text_:l in 6345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04735644 = score(doc=6345,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17973126 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045219366 = queryNorm
            0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 6345, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6345)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    TKE'96: Terminology and knowledge engineering. Proceedings 4th International Congress on Terminology and Knowledge Engineering, 26.-28.8.1996, Wien. Ed.: C. Galinski u. K.-D. Schmitz
  3. Fischer, D.H.: Converting a thesaurus to OWL : Notes on the paper "The National Cancer Institute's Thesaurus and Ontology" (2004) 0.00 
    0.003940372 = product of:
  0.019701859 = sum of:
    0.019701859 = product of:
      0.078807436 = sum of:
        0.078807436 = weight(_text_:editors in 2362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.078807436 = score(doc=2362,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3035703 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045219366 = queryNorm
            0.25960192 = fieldWeight in 2362, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2362)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The paper analysed here is a kind of position paper. In order to get a better under-standing of the reported work I used the retrieval interface of the thesaurus, the so-called NCI DTS Browser accessible via the Web3, and I perused the cited OWL file4 with numerous "Find" and "Find next" string searches. In addition the file was im-ported into Protégé 2000, Release 2.0, with OWL Plugin 1.0 and Racer Plugin 1.7.14. At the end of the paper's introduction the authors say: "In the following sections, this paper will describe the terminology development process at NCI, and the issues associated with converting a description logic based nomenclature to a semantically rich OWL ontology." While I will not deal with the first part, i.e. the terminology development process at NCI, I do not see the thesaurus as a description logic based nomenclature, or its cur-rent state and conversion already result in a "rich" OWL ontology. What does "rich" mean here? According to my view there is a great quantity of concepts and links but a very poor description logic structure which enables inferences. And what does the fol-lowing really mean, which is said a few lines previously: "Although editors have defined a number of named ontologic relations to support the description-logic based structure of the Thesaurus, additional relation-ships are considered for inclusion as required to support dependent applications."

Authors

Years

Languages

Types