-
Ding, Y.; Foo, S.: Ontology research and development : part 1 - a review of ontology generation (2002)
0.05
0.04908396 = product of:
0.09816792 = sum of:
0.09816792 = product of:
0.19633584 = sum of:
0.19633584 = weight(_text_:y in 3808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19633584 = score(doc=3808,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26375747 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05480788 = queryNorm
0.7443802 = fieldWeight in 3808, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3808)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Ding, Y.; Chowdhury, G.C.; Foo, S.: Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis (2001)
0.04
0.042071965 = product of:
0.08414393 = sum of:
0.08414393 = product of:
0.16828786 = sum of:
0.16828786 = weight(_text_:y in 6487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16828786 = score(doc=6487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26375747 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05480788 = queryNorm
0.6380402 = fieldWeight in 6487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6487)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Ding, Y.; Chowdhury, G.C.; Foo, S.: Incorporating the results of co-word analyses to increase search variety for information retrieval (2000)
0.04
0.042071965 = product of:
0.08414393 = sum of:
0.08414393 = product of:
0.16828786 = sum of:
0.16828786 = weight(_text_:y in 6328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16828786 = score(doc=6328,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26375747 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05480788 = queryNorm
0.6380402 = fieldWeight in 6328, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6328)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Ding, Y.; Foo, S.: Ontology research and development : part 2 - a review of ontology mapping and evolving (2002)
0.04
0.042071965 = product of:
0.08414393 = sum of:
0.08414393 = product of:
0.16828786 = sum of:
0.16828786 = weight(_text_:y in 3835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16828786 = score(doc=3835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26375747 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05480788 = queryNorm
0.6380402 = fieldWeight in 3835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3835)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Ding, Y.; Chowdhury, G.; Foo, S.: Organsising keywords in a Web search environment : a methodology based on co-word analysis (2000)
0.02
0.021035982 = product of:
0.042071965 = sum of:
0.042071965 = product of:
0.08414393 = sum of:
0.08414393 = weight(_text_:y in 105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08414393 = score(doc=105,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26375747 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05480788 = queryNorm
0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 105, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=105)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Ding, Y.; Jacob, E.K.; Zhang, Z.; Foo, S.; Yan, E.; George, N.L.; Guo, L.: Perspectives on social tagging (2009)
0.02
0.021035982 = product of:
0.042071965 = sum of:
0.042071965 = product of:
0.08414393 = sum of:
0.08414393 = weight(_text_:y in 3290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08414393 = score(doc=3290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26375747 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05480788 = queryNorm
0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 3290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3290)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Ding, Y.; Jacob, E.K.; Fried, M.; Toma, I.; Yan, E.; Foo, S.; Milojevicacute, S.: Upper tag ontology for integrating social tagging data (2010)
0.02
0.021035982 = product of:
0.042071965 = sum of:
0.042071965 = product of:
0.08414393 = sum of:
0.08414393 = weight(_text_:y in 3421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08414393 = score(doc=3421,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26375747 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.05480788 = queryNorm
0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 3421, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3421)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Liew, C.L.; Foo, S.; Chennupati, K.R.: ¬A proposed integrated environment for enhanced user interaction and value-adding of electronic documents : an empirical evaluation (2001)
0.01
0.014851422 = product of:
0.029702844 = sum of:
0.029702844 = product of:
0.05940569 = sum of:
0.05940569 = weight(_text_:22 in 5196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05940569 = score(doc=5196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05480788 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5196)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.1, S.22-35
-
Sharma, R.S.; Foo, S.; Morales-Arroyo, M.A.: Developing corporate taxonomies for knowledge auditability : a framework for good practices (2008)
0.01
0.013348364 = product of:
0.026696729 = sum of:
0.026696729 = product of:
0.106786914 = sum of:
0.106786914 = weight(_text_:authors in 1922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.106786914 = score(doc=1922,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24985893 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05480788 = queryNorm
0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 1922, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1922)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The organisation of knowledge for exploitation and re-use in the modern enterprise is often a most perplexing challenge. The entire knowledge management life-cycle (for example - create, capture, organize, store, search, and transfer) is impacted by the organisation of intellectual capital into a corporate taxonomy or at the least a knowledge map (often incorrectly used interchangeably). Determining the extent to which such an objective is achieved is the focus of what is known as a knowledge audit. In this practice-oriented article, the authors review the fundamentals of creating a taxonomy, the use of metadata in a necessary process known as classification and the role of expertise locators where the knowledge is not explicit but resides within experts in the form of tacit knowledge. The authors conclude with a framework for developing a corporate taxonomy and how such a project may be executed. The conceptual contribution of this article is the postulation that corporate taxonomies that are designed to facilitate knowledge audits lead to greater organizational impact.
