Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0020741653 = product of:
  0.04355747 = sum of:
    0.04355747 = sum of:
      0.004090291 = weight(_text_:e in 4260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.004090291 = score(doc=4260,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.036794472 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02559847 = queryNorm
          0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 4260, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4260)
      0.03946718 = weight(_text_:learning in 4260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03946718 = score(doc=4260,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.11429402 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02559847 = queryNorm
          0.3453127 = fieldWeight in 4260, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.464877 = idf(docFreq=1382, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4260)
  0.04761905 = coord(1/21)

Abstract

Describes an experiment conducted with 30 post graduate information science and librarianship students to discover how they might go about learning from an ideal database. A system was created which preserved the characteristics of a computer based environment, yet which freed itself from the constraints of current technology. The students were, in fact, interacting via computer screen with 2 human expert backed up with appropriate computer files and documentation. Results suggest a number of different information accessing strategies linked to relatively successful and less successful retrieval. Discusses the implications of the results for the design of computerized information retrieval systems

Language

e

0.001111419 = product of:
  0.0116699 = sum of:
    0.002337309 = product of:
      0.004674618 = sum of:
        0.004674618 = weight(_text_:e in 6515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004674618 = score(doc=6515,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.036794472 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02559847 = queryNorm
            0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 6515, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6515)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.009332591 = product of:
      0.027997771 = sum of:
        0.027997771 = weight(_text_:29 in 6515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027997771 = score(doc=6515,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09004741 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02559847 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 6515, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6515)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.0952381 = coord(2/21)

Language

e

Source

Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.5, S.569-585