Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
- Did you mean:
- rswk_00%3a%22Bibliotheksorganisation %2f strategisches management %28HBZ%29%22 2
- rswk_00%3a%22Bibliotheksorganisation %2f strategischen management %28HBZ%29%22 2
- rswk_00%3a%22Bibliotheksorganisation %2f strategischer management %28HBZ%29%22 2
- rswk_00%3a%22Bibliotheksorganisation %2f strategischem management %28HBZ%29%22 2
- rswk_00%3a%22Bibliotheksorganisation %2f strategische management %28HBZ%29%22 2
-
Li, X.; Cox, A.; Ford, N.; Creaser, C.; Fry, J.; Willett, P.: Knowledge construction by users : a content analysis framework and a knowledge construction process model for virtual product user communities (2017)
0.00
0.0048642284 = product of: 0.02432114 = sum of: 0.02432114 = weight(_text_:management in 3574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.02432114 = score(doc=3574,freq=2.0), product of: 0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of: 3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218) 0.038751747 = queryNorm 0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 3574, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218) 0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3574) 0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to develop a content analysis framework and from that derive a process model of knowledge construction in the context of virtual product user communities, organization sponsored online forums where product users collaboratively construct knowledge to solve their technical problems. Design/methodology/approach The study is based on a deductive and qualitative content analysis of discussion threads about solving technical problems selected from a series of virtual product user communities. Data are complemented with thematic analysis of interviews with forum members. Findings The research develops a content analysis framework for knowledge construction. It is based on a combination of existing codes derived from frameworks developed for computer-supported collaborative learning and new categories identified from the data. Analysis using this framework allows the authors to propose a knowledge construction process model showing how these elements are organized around a typical "trial and error" knowledge construction strategy. Practical implications The research makes suggestions about organizations' management of knowledge activities in virtual product user communities, including moderators' roles in facilitation. Originality/value The paper outlines a new framework for analysing knowledge activities where there is a low level of critical thinking and a model of knowledge construction by trial and error. The new framework and model can be applied in other similar contexts.
-
Ford, N.: Introduction to information behaviour (2015)
0.00
0.003500218 = product of: 0.01750109 = sum of: 0.01750109 = product of: 0.05250327 = sum of: 0.05250327 = weight(_text_:22 in 3341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.05250327 = score(doc=3341,freq=2.0), product of: 0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of: 3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218) 0.038751747 = queryNorm 0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3341, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218) 0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3341) 0.33333334 = coord(1/3) 0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 1.2017 16:45:48
Authors
- Cox, A. 1
- Creaser, C. 1
- Fry, J. 1
- Li, X. 1
- Willett, P. 1