Foskett, D.J.: Concerning general and special classifications (1991)
0.05
0.049004577 = product of:
0.098009154 = sum of:
0.098009154 = product of:
0.29402745 = sum of:
0.29402745 = weight(_text_:bliss in 2189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.29402745 = score(doc=2189,freq=4.0), product of:
0.37579033 = queryWeight, product of:
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.052531693 = queryNorm
0.7824242 = fieldWeight in 2189, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
7.1535926 = idf(docFreq=93, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2189)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The experience of the British Classification Research Group (CRG) suggests that a good general scheme could be compiled by integrating specialist schemes. Examples are given from the 1990 revision of class J Education of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification. Sequences in arrays may need adjustment to suit different needs, but a general, or "Ur-Classification" will provide a reservoir of terms for specialist schemes, while the special schemes provide detailed analysis and emuneration by experts in each field. A fraction of money spent on new library buildings would enable the compilation of such a general scheme, which could well be based on the BC2 edition of Bliss B.C.
