-
Frâncu, V.: ¬An interpretation of the FRBR model (2004)
0.04
0.04198845 = sum of:
0.025430236 = product of:
0.076290704 = sum of:
0.076290704 = weight(_text_:objects in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076290704 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3247862 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.06110665 = queryNorm
0.23489517 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.016558215 = product of:
0.03311643 = sum of:
0.03311643 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03311643 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21398507 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06110665 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- 1. Introduction With the diversification of the material available in library collections such as: music, film, 3D objects, cartographic material and electronic resources like CD-ROMS and Web sites, the existing cataloguing principles and codes are no longer adequate to enable the user to find, identify, select and obtain a particular entity. The problem is not only that material fails to be appropriately represented in the catalogue records but also access to such material, or parts of it, is difficult if possible at all. Consequently, the need emerged to develop new rules and build up a new conceptual model able to cope with all the requirements demanded by the existing library material. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records developed by an IFLA Study Group from 1992 through 1997 present a generalised view of the bibliographic universe and are intended to be independent of any cataloguing code or implementation (Tillett, 2002). Outstanding scholars like Antonio Panizzi, Charles A. Cutter and Seymour Lubetzky formulated the basic cataloguing principles of which some can be retrieved, as Denton (2003) argues as updated versions, between the basic lines of the FRBR model: - the relation work-author groups all the works of an author - all the editions, translations, adaptations of a work are clearly separated (as expressions and manifestations) - all the expressions and manifestations of a work are collocated with their related works in bibliographic families - any document (manifestation and item) can be found if the author, title or subject of that document is known - the author is authorised by the authority control - the title is an intrinsic part of the work + authority control entity
- Date
- 17. 6.2015 14:40:22
-
Frâncu, V.: Subjects in FRBR and poly-hierarchical thesauri as possible knowledge organization tools (2006)
0.02
0.015893899 = product of:
0.031787798 = sum of:
0.031787798 = product of:
0.095363386 = sum of:
0.095363386 = weight(_text_:objects in 259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.095363386 = score(doc=259,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3247862 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.06110665 = queryNorm
0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 259, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=259)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The paper presents the possibilities offered by poly-hierarchical conceptual structures as knowledge organizers, starting from the FRBR entity-relation model. Of the ten entities defined in the FRBR model, the first six, the bibliographic entities plus those representing the intellectual responsibilities, are clearly described by their attributes. Unlike those the other four representing subjects in their own right: concepts, objects, events and places only have the term for the entity as attribute. Subjects have to be more extensively treated in a revised version of the FRBR model, with particular attention for the semantic and syntactic relations between concepts representing subjects themselves and between these concepts and terms used in indexing. The conceptual model of poly-hierarchical thesauri is regarded as an entity-relation model, one capable to accommodate both conceptually and relationally subjects in the bibliographic universe. Polyhierarchical thesauri are considered as frameworks or templates meant to enhance knowledge representation and to support information searching.
-
Frâncu, V.; Sabo, C.-N.: Implementation of a UDC-based multilingual thesaurus in a library catalogue : the case of BiblioPhil (2010)
0.01
0.01241866 = product of:
0.02483732 = sum of:
0.02483732 = product of:
0.04967464 = sum of:
0.04967464 = weight(_text_:22 in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04967464 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21398507 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06110665 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2010 20:40:56
-
Frâncu, V.; Popescu, T.: Twenty years after : scientific research in the field of knowledge organization in Romania (1993-2012) (2014)
0.01
0.010348884 = product of:
0.020697769 = sum of:
0.020697769 = product of:
0.041395538 = sum of:
0.041395538 = weight(_text_:22 in 4692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041395538 = score(doc=4692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21398507 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06110665 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4692)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
