Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
- Did you mean:
- bliss%3a%2281.68 computereinsatz in unterricht und ausbildung%22 2
- bliss%3a%2181.68 computereinsatz in unterricht und ausbildung%22 2
- bliss%3a%2281.68 computereinsatz in unterrichts und ausbildung%22 2
- bliss%3a%2281.68 computereinsatzes in unterricht und ausbildung%22 2
- bross%3a%2281.68 computereinsatz in unterricht und ausbildung%22 2
-
Frâncu, V.; Sabo, C.-N.: Implementation of a UDC-based multilingual thesaurus in a library catalogue : the case of BiblioPhil (2010)
0.01
0.010636792 = product of: 0.031910375 = sum of: 0.014166778 = weight(_text_:in in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.014166778 = score(doc=3697,freq=14.0), product of: 0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of: 1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218) 0.043654136 = queryNorm 0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of: 3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of: 14.0 = termFreq=14.0 1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218) 0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697) 0.017743597 = product of: 0.035487194 = sum of: 0.035487194 = weight(_text_:22 in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.035487194 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of: 0.15286934 = queryWeight, product of: 3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218) 0.043654136 = queryNorm 0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218) 0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- In order to enhance the use of Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) numbers in information retrieval, the authors have represented classification with multilingual thesaurus descriptors and implemented this solution in an automated way. The authors illustrate a solution implemented in a BiblioPhil library system. The standard formats used are UNIMARC for subject authority records (i.e. the UDC-based multilingual thesaurus) and MARC XML support for data transfer. The multilingual thesaurus was built according to existing standards, the constituent parts of the classification notations being used as the basis for search terms in the multilingual information retrieval. The verbal equivalents, descriptors and non-descriptors, are used to expand the number of concepts and are given in Romanian, English and French. This approach saves the time of the indexer and provides more user-friendly and easier access to the bibliographic information. The multilingual aspect of the thesaurus enhances information access for a greater number of online users
- Date
- 22. 7.2010 20:40:56
-
Frâncu, V.: Harmonizing a universal classification system with an interdisciplinary multilingual thesaurus : advantages and limitations (2000)
0.00
0.0025762038 = product of: 0.015457222 = sum of: 0.015457222 = weight(_text_:in in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.015457222 = score(doc=108,freq=24.0), product of: 0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of: 1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218) 0.043654136 = queryNorm 0.260307 = fieldWeight in 108, product of: 4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of: 24.0 = termFreq=24.0 1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218) 0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=108) 0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- The case under consideration is a project of building an interdisciplinary multilingual thesaurus (Romanian-English-French) starting from a list of indexing terms based on an abridged version of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC). The resulting thesaurus is intended for public libraries for both indexing and searching purposes in bibliographic databases covering a wide range of topics but with a fairly low level of specificity. The problems encountered in such an approach fall into two groups: 1) concordance or compatibility problems in terms of the indexing languages considered (between a classification system and a thesaurus); 2) equivalence and, hence, translatability problems in terms of the natural languages involved. Additionally, the question of ambiguity given the co-occurrence of terms in more than one class, will be discussed with reference to homographs and polysemantic words. In a thesaurus with such a wide coverage yet with a low specificity level, the method adopted in the thesaurus construction was to provide as many lead-in terms as possible and post them up to the closest in meaning broader term in order to improve the recall ratio
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.7
- Source
- Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al