Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Frâncu, V."
  1. Frâncu, V.: ¬An interpretation of the FRBR model (2004) 0.02
    0.021197459 = product of:
      0.042394917 = sum of:
        0.042394917 = sum of:
          0.013981805 = weight(_text_:1 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.013981805 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052428056 = queryNorm
              0.1085631 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
          0.028413111 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028413111 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052428056 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    1. Introduction With the diversification of the material available in library collections such as: music, film, 3D objects, cartographic material and electronic resources like CD-ROMS and Web sites, the existing cataloguing principles and codes are no longer adequate to enable the user to find, identify, select and obtain a particular entity. The problem is not only that material fails to be appropriately represented in the catalogue records but also access to such material, or parts of it, is difficult if possible at all. Consequently, the need emerged to develop new rules and build up a new conceptual model able to cope with all the requirements demanded by the existing library material. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records developed by an IFLA Study Group from 1992 through 1997 present a generalised view of the bibliographic universe and are intended to be independent of any cataloguing code or implementation (Tillett, 2002). Outstanding scholars like Antonio Panizzi, Charles A. Cutter and Seymour Lubetzky formulated the basic cataloguing principles of which some can be retrieved, as Denton (2003) argues as updated versions, between the basic lines of the FRBR model: - the relation work-author groups all the works of an author - all the editions, translations, adaptations of a work are clearly separated (as expressions and manifestations) - all the expressions and manifestations of a work are collocated with their related works in bibliographic families - any document (manifestation and item) can be found if the author, title or subject of that document is known - the author is authorised by the authority control - the title is an intrinsic part of the work + authority control entity
    Date
    17. 6.2015 14:40:22
  2. Frâncu, V.; Sabo, C.-N.: Implementation of a UDC-based multilingual thesaurus in a library catalogue : the case of BiblioPhil (2010) 0.01
    0.010654917 = product of:
      0.021309834 = sum of:
        0.021309834 = product of:
          0.042619668 = sum of:
            0.042619668 = weight(_text_:22 in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042619668 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052428056 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2010 20:40:56
  3. Frâncu, V.; Popescu, T.: Twenty years after : scientific research in the field of knowledge organization in Romania (1993-2012) (2014) 0.01
    0.008879097 = product of:
      0.017758194 = sum of:
        0.017758194 = product of:
          0.03551639 = sum of:
            0.03551639 = weight(_text_:22 in 4692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03551639 = score(doc=4692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052428056 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4692)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  4. Frâncu, V.: Harmonizing a universal classification system with an interdisciplinary multilingual thesaurus : advantages and limitations (2000) 0.00
    0.0043693143 = product of:
      0.008738629 = sum of:
        0.008738629 = product of:
          0.017477257 = sum of:
            0.017477257 = weight(_text_:1 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017477257 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052428056 = queryNorm
                0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The case under consideration is a project of building an interdisciplinary multilingual thesaurus (Romanian-English-French) starting from a list of indexing terms based on an abridged version of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC). The resulting thesaurus is intended for public libraries for both indexing and searching purposes in bibliographic databases covering a wide range of topics but with a fairly low level of specificity. The problems encountered in such an approach fall into two groups: 1) concordance or compatibility problems in terms of the indexing languages considered (between a classification system and a thesaurus); 2) equivalence and, hence, translatability problems in terms of the natural languages involved. Additionally, the question of ambiguity given the co-occurrence of terms in more than one class, will be discussed with reference to homographs and polysemantic words. In a thesaurus with such a wide coverage yet with a low specificity level, the method adopted in the thesaurus construction was to provide as many lead-in terms as possible and post them up to the closest in meaning broader term in order to improve the recall ratio
  5. Frâncu, V.: 14th National Conference of the Association of Librarians in Education - Romania (Asociatia Bibliotecarilor din Invatamant - Romania - ABIR) (2004) 0.00
    0.0043693143 = product of:
      0.008738629 = sum of:
        0.008738629 = product of:
          0.017477257 = sum of:
            0.017477257 = weight(_text_:1 in 3024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017477257 = score(doc=3024,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052428056 = queryNorm
                0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 3024, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3024)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 31(2004) no.1, S.66-68