Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Frâncu, V."
  1. Frâncu, V.: ¬An interpretation of the FRBR model (2004) 0.02
    0.024788357 = product of:
      0.08675925 = sum of:
        0.07663343 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07663343 = score(doc=2647,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037368443 = queryNorm
            0.35801122 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
        0.010125816 = product of:
          0.020251632 = sum of:
            0.020251632 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020251632 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037368443 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Despite the existence of a logical structural model for bibliographic records which integrates any record type, library catalogues persist in offering catalogue records at the level of 'items'. Such records however, do not clearly indicate which works they contain. Hence the search possibilities of the end user are unduly limited. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) present through a conceptual model, independent of any cataloguing code or implementation, a globalized view of the bibliographic universe. This model, a synthesis of the existing cataloguing rules, consists of clearly structured entities and well defined types of relationships among them. From a theoretical viewpoint, the model is likely to be a good knowledge organiser with great potential in identifying the author and the work represented by an item or publication and is able to link different works of the author with different editions, translations or adaptations of those works aiming at better answering the user needs. This paper is presenting an interpretation of the FRBR model opposing it to a traditional bibliographic record of a complex library material.
    Date
    17. 6.2015 14:40:22
  2. Frâncu, V.; Popescu, T.: Twenty years after : scientific research in the field of knowledge organization in Romania (1993-2012) (2014) 0.02
    0.022969227 = product of:
      0.08039229 = sum of:
        0.067735024 = weight(_text_:interpretation in 4692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067735024 = score(doc=4692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21405315 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037368443 = queryNorm
            0.3164402 = fieldWeight in 4692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.7281795 = idf(docFreq=390, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4692)
        0.01265727 = product of:
          0.02531454 = sum of:
            0.02531454 = weight(_text_:22 in 4692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02531454 = score(doc=4692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037368443 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4692)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    The main point that we want to state in this study is that research in the field of knowledge organization in Romania over the last twenty years is unequally and unjustly distributed among different professional categories ranging from library and information science faculty members, library professionals, software tools developers and independent researchers. The special condition of library and information science functioning as a university department in Romania with an interruption of 20 years (1970-1990) affected the overall situation of scientific research in the specific fields associated with this discipline. Our study has three stages: data collection, data recording and data interpretation. The primary outcomes of the scientific research activities considered are publications (books, book chapters and journal articles). Given this, our interest will be directed towards analyzing to what extent research and writing for publication have an impact on the evolution of Romanian libraries over this twenty years span.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  3. Frâncu, V.; Sabo, C.-N.: Implementation of a UDC-based multilingual thesaurus in a library catalogue : the case of BiblioPhil (2010) 0.00
    0.0021698177 = product of:
      0.015188723 = sum of:
        0.015188723 = product of:
          0.030377446 = sum of:
            0.030377446 = weight(_text_:22 in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030377446 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13085791 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037368443 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2010 20:40:56