Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Frandsen, T.F."
  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  1. Frandsen, T.F.: ¬The integration of open access journals in the scholarly communication system : three science fields (2009) 0.05
    0.05187072 = product of:
      0.20748287 = sum of:
        0.20748287 = weight(_text_:fields in 4210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20748287 = score(doc=4210,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.31604284 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.65650237 = fieldWeight in 4210, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.951651 = idf(docFreq=849, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4210)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The greatest number of open access journals (OAJs) is found in the sciences and their influence is growing. However, there are only a few studies on the acceptance and thereby integration of these OAJs in the scholarly communication system. Even fewer studies provide insight into the differences across disciplines. This study is an analysis of the citing behaviour in journals within three science fields: biology, mathematics, and pharmacy and pharmacology. It is a statistical analysis of OAJs as well as non-OAJs including both the citing and cited side of the journal to journal citations. The multivariate linear regression reveals many similarities in citing behaviour across fields and media. But it also points to great differences in the integration of OAJs. The integration of OAJs in the scholarly communication system varies considerably across fields. The implications for bibliometric research are discussed.
  2. Frandsen, T.F.; Wouters, P.: Turning working papers into journal articles : an exercise in microbibliometrics (2009) 0.01
    0.0129712615 = product of:
      0.051885046 = sum of:
        0.051885046 = weight(_text_:22 in 2757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051885046 = score(doc=2757,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2235069 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06382575 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2757, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2757)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:59:25

Themes