Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Freire, N."
  1. Freire, N.: Linking library data: contributions and role of subject data (2015) 0.03
    0.03195362 = product of:
      0.06390724 = sum of:
        0.008582841 = weight(_text_:information in 2291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008582841 = score(doc=2291,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2291, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2291)
        0.0553244 = weight(_text_:standards in 2291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0553244 = score(doc=2291,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.24621427 = fieldWeight in 2291, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2291)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Linking and sharing data across organizations has been practiced by libraries for many decades, and can be observed in some of the most common data resources from libraries, such as union catalogues, authority files, and controlled vocabularies. In the new global data space, the benefits of library linked data (LLD) have been widely recognized within the library community. LLD practice emerged as a new approach to data sharing within and beyond the library environment, transforming the old models of distribution and reuse of subject library data. There are several parallel on-going activities towards establishing standards and best practices for the creation and publishing of LLD to meet the growing prospects of a more data-oriented global information space. In this context, the opportunities for libraries are twofold: not only do LLD initiatives bring librarians' data management expertise into the limelight, they also extend the value and reach of library data resources which become widely and easily reusable across domains. Libraries are already contributing open linked datasets which are being re-used by many different communities and for a variety of purposes. Some success cases already exist, such as library controlled vocabularies becoming linkable major reference sources for certain types of entities, or fundamental data service infrastructures based on, or derived from, library authority files. An additional field for LLD use is emerging within the new research data e-infrastructures, which provides new opportunities for the application of library classification and subject authority control expertise and resources in research data management.
  2. Isaac, A.; Raemy, J.A.; Meijers, E.; Valk, S. De; Freire, N.: Metadata aggregation via linked data : results of the Europeana Common Culture project (2020) 0.02
    0.016597321 = product of:
      0.066389285 = sum of:
        0.066389285 = weight(_text_:standards in 39) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066389285 = score(doc=39,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.29545712 = fieldWeight in 39, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=39)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Digital cultural heritage resources are widely available on the web through the digital libraries of heritage institutions. To address the difficulties of discoverability in cultural heritage, the common practice is metadata aggregation, where centralized efforts like Europeana facilitate discoverability by collecting the resources' metadata. We present the results of the linked data aggregation task conducted within the Europeana Common Culture project, which attempted an innovative approach to aggregation based on linked data made available by cultural heritage institutions. This task ran for one year with participation of eleven organizations, involving the three member roles of the Europeana network: data providers, intermediary aggregators, and the central aggregation hub, Europeana. We report on the challenges that were faced by data providers, the standards and specifications applied, and the resulting aggregated metadata.
  3. Freire, N.; Charles, V.; Isaac, A.: Subject information and multilingualism in European bibliographic datasets : experiences with Universal Decimal Classification (2015) 0.00
    0.0042914203 = product of:
      0.017165681 = sum of:
        0.017165681 = weight(_text_:information in 2289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017165681 = score(doc=2289,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 2289, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2289)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)