Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Froehlich, T.J."
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Froehlich, T.J.: Ethical considerations of information professionals (1992) 0.00
    0.0023678814 = product of:
      0.0047357627 = sum of:
        0.0047357627 = product of:
          0.009471525 = sum of:
            0.009471525 = weight(_text_:a in 6741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009471525 = score(doc=6741,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 6741, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6741)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  2. Froehlich, T.J.: Towards a better conceptual framework for understanding relevance for information science research (1991) 0.00
    0.0023435948 = product of:
      0.0046871896 = sum of:
        0.0046871896 = product of:
          0.009374379 = sum of:
            0.009374379 = weight(_text_:a in 3676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009374379 = score(doc=3676,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 3676, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3676)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the history of information science, particularly with regard to its understanding of an approach to relevance. Explains important aspects of the prototypical approach to human categorisation theory and its application to the notion of relevance. Shows how much information science research is flawed because it endorses a classical approach to categorisation theory and fails to explain experience adequately
    Type
    a
  3. Froehlich, T.J.: Relevance reconsidered : towards an agenda for the 21st century (1994) 0.00
    0.0014351527 = product of:
      0.0028703054 = sum of:
        0.0028703054 = product of:
          0.005740611 = sum of:
            0.005740611 = weight(_text_:a in 6925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005740611 = score(doc=6925,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 6925, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6925)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The publication of this issue marks a special event for JASIS: the introduction of special topics issues. It seems appropriate that the first issue is devoted to the topic of relevance, acknowledged as the most fundamental and much debated concern for information science, it being tha tacit or explicit judgment of end-users about the output of information retrieval systems. Early on, information scientists recognized that the concept of relevance was integral to information system design, development, and evaluation. However, there was little agreement as to the exact nature of relevance and even less that it could be operationalized in systems or for the evaluation of systems. While this lack of agreement continues to an extent at the present, some common understandings have developed, and these are reflected in the papers in this issue
    Type
    a