Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Frohmann, B."
  1. Frohmann, B.: Communication technologies and the politics of postmodern information science (1994) 0.01
    0.0052266745 = product of:
      0.015680023 = sum of:
        0.0052644373 = weight(_text_:e in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052644373 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03294669 = queryNorm
            0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
        0.010415585 = product of:
          0.031246753 = sum of:
            0.031246753 = weight(_text_:22 in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031246753 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1153737 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03294669 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Language
    e
    Source
    Canadian journal of information and library science. 19(1994) no.2, S.1-22
  2. Frohmann, B.: ¬The Dewey Decimal Classification as technobureaucratic discourse (1994) 0.00
    0.0017548124 = product of:
      0.010528875 = sum of:
        0.010528875 = weight(_text_:e in 8902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010528875 = score(doc=8902,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03294669 = queryNorm
            0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 8902, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8902)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Language
    e
  3. Frohmann, B.: ¬The power of images : a discourse analysis of the cognitive viewpoint (1992) 0.00
    0.0010635771 = product of:
      0.0063814623 = sum of:
        0.0063814623 = weight(_text_:e in 5253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0063814623 = score(doc=5253,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03294669 = queryNorm
            0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 5253, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5253)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    A discourse analysis of the cognitive viewpoint in library and information science identifies seven discourse strategies which constitute information as a commodity, and persons as surveyable information consumers, within market economy conditions. These strategies are: (a) universality of theory, (b) referentiality and reification of 'images', (c) internalisation of representations (d) radical individualism and erasure of the social dimension of theory, (e) insistence upon knowledge, (f) constitution of the information scientist as an expert in image negotiation, and (g) instrumental reason, ruled by efficiency, standardisation, predictibility, and determination of effects. The discourse is guided throughout by a yearning for natural-scientific theory. The effect of the cognitive viewpoint's discursive strategy is to enable knowledge acquisition of information processes only when users' and generators 'images' are constituted as objectively given natural-scientific entities, and ti disable knowledge of the same processes when considered as products of social practices. By its constitution of users as free creators of images, of the information scientist as an expert in image interpretation and delivery, and of databases as repositories of unmediated models of the world, the cognitive viewpoint performs ideological labour for modern capitalist image markets
    Language
    e
  4. Frohmann, B.: ¬The social construction of knowledge organization : the case of Melvyl Dewey (1994) 0.00
    0.00100275 = product of:
      0.0060165 = sum of:
        0.0060165 = weight(_text_:e in 7726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0060165 = score(doc=7726,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03294669 = queryNorm
            0.12704675 = fieldWeight in 7726, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7726)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Language
    e
  5. Frohmann, B.: Knowledge and power in information science : toward a discourse analysis of the cognitive viewpoint (1995) 0.00
    8.863142E-4 = product of:
      0.005317885 = sum of:
        0.005317885 = weight(_text_:e in 2711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005317885 = score(doc=2711,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03294669 = queryNorm
            0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 2711, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2711)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    A discourse analysis of the cognitive viewpoint in library and information science (LIS) identifies seven discursive strategies which constitute information as a commodity, and persons as surveyable information consumers, within market economy conditions. These strategies are (a) universality of theory, (b) referentiality and reification of 'images', (c) internationalization of representation, (d) insistence upon knowledge, (e) constitution of the information scientists as an expert in image negotiation, (f) radical individualism and erasure of the social dimension of theory, and (g) instrumental reasons, rules by efficiency, standardization, predictibility,a nd determination of effects. The discourse is guided troughout by a yearning for natural-scientific theory. The effect of the cognitiv viewpoint's discoursive strategy is to anable knowledge acquisition of information processes only when users' and generators 'images' are constituted as objectively given natural scientif entites, and to disable knowledge of the same processes when considered as products of social practices. By its constitution of users as free creators of images, of the information scientist as an expert in image interpretation and delivery, and of databases as repositories of unmediated models of the world, the cognitive viewpoint performs ideological labour for modern capitalist image markets
    Language
    e
  6. Frohmann, B.: Rules of indexing : a critique of mentalism in information retrieval theory (1990) 0.00
    8.774062E-4 = product of:
      0.0052644373 = sum of:
        0.0052644373 = weight(_text_:e in 3908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052644373 = score(doc=3908,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03294669 = queryNorm
            0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 3908, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3908)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Language
    e
  7. Frohmann, B.: Cognitive paradigms and user needs (1992) 0.00
    7.520625E-4 = product of:
      0.0045123748 = sum of:
        0.0045123748 = weight(_text_:e in 2382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0045123748 = score(doc=2382,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03294669 = queryNorm
            0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 2382, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2382)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Language
    e
  8. Frohmann, B.: Documentation redux : prolegomenon to (another) philosophy of information (2004) 0.00
    7.520625E-4 = product of:
      0.0045123748 = sum of:
        0.0045123748 = weight(_text_:e in 826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0045123748 = score(doc=826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03294669 = queryNorm
            0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=826)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Language
    e
  9. Frohmann, B.: Subjectivity and information ethics (2008) 0.00
    7.090514E-4 = product of:
      0.004254308 = sum of:
        0.004254308 = weight(_text_:e in 1360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004254308 = score(doc=1360,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03294669 = queryNorm
            0.08983562 = fieldWeight in 1360, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1360)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    In A Brief History of Information Ethics, Thomas Froehlich (2004) quickly surveyed under several broad categories some of the many issues that constitute information ethics: under the category of librarianship - censorship, privacy, access, balance in collections, copyright, fair use, and codes of ethics; under information science, which Froehlich sees as closely related to librarianship - confidentiality, bias, and quality of information; under computer ethics - intellectual property, privacy, fair representation, nonmaleficence, computer crime, software reliability, artificial intelligence, and e-commerce; under cyberethics (issues related to the Internet, or cyberspace) - expert systems, artificial intelligence (again), and robotics; under media ethics - news, impartiality, journalistic ethics, deceit, lies, sexuality, censorship (again), and violence in the press; and under intercultural information ethics - digital divide, and the ethical role of the Internet for social, political, cultural, and economic development. Many of the debates in information ethics, on these and other issues, have to do with specific kinds of relationships between subjects. The most important subject and a familiar figure in information ethics is the ethical subject engaged in moral deliberation, whether appearing as the bearer of moral rights and obligations to other subjects, or as an agent whose actions are judged, whether by others or by oneself, according to the standards of various moral codes and ethical principles. Many debates in information ethics revolve around conflicts between those acting according to principles of unfettered access to information and those finding some information offensive or harmful. Subjectivity is at the heart of information ethics. But how is subjectivity understood? Can it be understood in ways that broaden ethical reflection to include problems that remain invisible when subjectivity is taken for granted and when how it is created remains unquestioned? This article proposes some answers by investigating the meaning and role of subjectivity in information ethics.[In an article on cyberethics (2000), I asserted that there was no information ethics in any special sense beyond the application of general ethical principles to information services. Here, I take a more expansive view.]
    Language
    e
  10. Frohmann, B.: Revisiting "what is a document?" (2009) 0.00
    6.2671874E-4 = product of:
      0.0037603125 = sum of:
        0.0037603125 = weight(_text_:e in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0037603125 = score(doc=2837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.047356583 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03294669 = queryNorm
            0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Language
    e