Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Frost, C.O."
  1. Frost, C.O.: ¬The literature of online public access catalogs, 1980-85 : an analysis of citation patterns (1989) 0.00
    0.004463867 = product of:
      0.0133916 = sum of:
        0.0133916 = product of:
          0.0267832 = sum of:
            0.0267832 = weight(_text_:of in 358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0267832 = score(doc=358,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 358, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=358)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  2. Frost, C.O.; Janes, J.: ¬An empirical test of gopher searching using three organizational schemes : background and methods (1994) 0.00
    0.00436691 = product of:
      0.01310073 = sum of:
        0.01310073 = product of:
          0.02620146 = sum of:
            0.02620146 = weight(_text_:of in 3031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02620146 = score(doc=3031,freq=20.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.38244802 = fieldWeight in 3031, product of:
                  4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                    20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3031)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes the background underlying and the methods to be used in an investigation of use of the gopher protocol for browsing and searching for information via the Internet. Networked information resources are notoriously difficult to find; gopher is one attempt to facilitate the processes of organization and retrieval in that environment. Our project will design classification schemes based on traditional library models (i.e. Dewey and Library of Congress) and compare use of these to use of an existing gopher. We describe the project, the research questions, literature on related issues, the construction of the classification schemes, and the experimental methodology used
    Source
    Navigating the networks: Proceedings of the 1994 Mid-year Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Portland, Oregon, May 21-25, 1994. Ed.: D.L. Andersen et al
  3. Frost, C.O.; Dede, B.A.: Subject heading compatibility between LCSH and catalog files of a large research library : a suggested model for analysis (1988) 0.00
    0.004142815 = product of:
      0.012428444 = sum of:
        0.012428444 = product of:
          0.024856888 = sum of:
            0.024856888 = weight(_text_:of in 655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024856888 = score(doc=655,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 655, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=655)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Assigned topical and geographic subject headings from a sample of 3.814 bibliographic records in the University of Michigan Library's catalog were analyzed to determine the degree of match with LCSH, 10th edition and to idetify types of heading conflicts that lend themselves to automatic subject authority control. The findings showed a surprising degree of agreement: 44 percent of headings matched LCSH 10th completely. For headings without subdivisions, the match was 88,4 percent. Since 93,6 percent of the topical subdivisions that did not match LCSH were found on the free-floating lists, some consideration should be given to developing a machine-readable file of free-floating subdivisons for matching purposes.
  4. Frost, C.O.: Next-generation online public access catalogs : redefining territory and roles (1994) 0.00
    0.0035289964 = product of:
      0.010586989 = sum of:
        0.010586989 = product of:
          0.021173978 = sum of:
            0.021173978 = weight(_text_:of in 5527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021173978 = score(doc=5527,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 5527, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5527)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    State of the art review of OPACs which suggests a model for their future development based on a redefinition of the roles previously served by the traditional catalogue. Notes the traditional role of library catalogues and considers the ways in which the catalogue's functions can be extended to provide access to the whole of the library 's resources including access to other libraries' collections
  5. Frost, C.O.: ¬The University of Michigan School of Information Art Image Browser : designing and testing a model for image retrieval (1996) 0.00
    0.0033478998 = product of:
      0.010043699 = sum of:
        0.010043699 = product of:
          0.020087399 = sum of:
            0.020087399 = weight(_text_:of in 5174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020087399 = score(doc=5174,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 5174, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5174)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    A team at the University of Michigan School of Information designed, implemented and is evaluating a WWW-based experimental system which uses classification to facilitate browsing of art images. The research team built a database of approximately 3.000 digitized images from Art History to determine if classification can be used for retrieving images from a digital database in a networked environment. A key premise in this research is that browsing can serve an important role in retrieving image information. The system was evaluated in controlled tests and through a questionnaire available to WWW users
    Source
    Knowledge organization and change: Proceedings of the Fourth International ISKO Conference, 15-18 July 1996, Library of Congress, Washington, DC. Ed.: R. Green
  6. Frost, C.O.: ¬A comparison of cataloging codes for serials : AACR2 and its predecessors (1983) 0.00
    0.0023673228 = product of:
      0.0071019684 = sum of:
        0.0071019684 = product of:
          0.014203937 = sum of:
            0.014203937 = weight(_text_:of in 285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014203937 = score(doc=285,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 285, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=285)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)