Göbel, S.: What the Citation Index is good for (1997)
0.01
0.0106776925 = product of:
0.04271077 = sum of:
0.021355385 = weight(_text_:und in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021355385 = score(doc=376,freq=2.0), product of:
0.087208875 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.039347667 = queryNorm
0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
0.021355385 = weight(_text_:und in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021355385 = score(doc=376,freq=2.0), product of:
0.087208875 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.039347667 = queryNorm
0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Footnote
- Ein Leserbrief zu Sinn und Nutzen des Science Citation Index als Erwiderung auf einen Beitrag von A. Octavio in Mathematical intelligencer 18(1996) no.4, S.9-11