Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

0.016146302 = product of:
  0.075349405 = sum of:
    0.038629785 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 4574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038629785 = score(doc=4574,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.121660605 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.31752092 = fieldWeight in 4574, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4574)
    0.0070627616 = weight(_text_:information in 4574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0070627616 = score(doc=4574,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 4574, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4574)
    0.029656855 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029656855 = score(doc=4574,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 4574, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4574)
  0.21428572 = coord(3/14)

Abstract

Facettenklassifikationen wurden bislang vorwiegend im Hinblick auf ihre Verwendungsmöglichkeiten in präkombinierten systematischen Katalogen bzw. Bibliographien betrachtet, nicht so sehr unter dem Aspekt eines möglichen Einsatzes in postkoordinierenden Retrievalsystemen. Im vorliegenden Beitrag soll nachgewiesen werden, daß Facettenklassifikationen anderen Techniken des Online Retrievals überlegen sein können. Hierzu sollten Begriffs- und Facettenanalyse mit einem strukturabbildenden Notationssystem kombiniert werden, um mit Hilfe Boolescher Operatoren (zur Verknüpfung von Facetten unabhängig von einer definierten Citation order) und Truncierung hierarchisch differenzierte Dokumentenmengen für komplexe Fragestellungen zu erhalten. Die Methode wird an zwei Beispielen illustriert: das erste nutzt eine kleine, von B. Buchanan entwickelte Klassifikation, das zweite das für Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA) verwendete Klassifikationssystem. Weiter wird am Beispiel PRECIS diskutiert, welche Möglichkeiten des syntaktischen Retrievals Rollenoperatoren bieten können.

Source

Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 16(1992) H.3, S.382-395

Theme

Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval

0.01062486 = product of:
  0.07437402 = sum of:
    0.012107591 = weight(_text_:information in 5067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012107591 = score(doc=5067,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 5067, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5067)
    0.06226643 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06226643 = score(doc=5067,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.6946405 = fieldWeight in 5067, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5067)
  0.14285715 = coord(2/14)

Abstract

Considers some structural features of UDC which may be of some importance to on-line information retrieval with synthesised UDC notations

Theme

Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval

0.00302621 = product of:
  0.042366937 = sum of:
    0.042366937 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042366937 = score(doc=922,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 922, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=922)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Theme

Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval

0.0025678244 = product of:
  0.03594954 = sum of:
    0.03594954 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03594954 = score(doc=1465,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.029633347 = queryNorm
        0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 1465, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1465)
  0.071428575 = coord(1/14)

Theme

Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval