Search (83 results, page 2 of 5)

  • × author_ss:"Gödert, W."
  • × language_ss:"d"
  1. Gödert, W.: Aufbereitung und Rezeption von Information (2003) 0.01 
    0.01374349 = product of:
  0.02748698 = sum of:
    0.02748698 = product of:
      0.04123047 = sum of:
        0.004032909 = weight(_text_:a in 1506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004032909 = score(doc=1506,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 1506, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1506)
        0.03719756 = weight(_text_:22 in 1506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03719756 = score(doc=1506,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1506, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1506)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 4.2003 11:45:29
    Type
    a
  2. Gödert, W.: Zum Problem der Äquivalenzrelation in Dokumentationssprachen (1987) 0.01 
    0.013570441 = product of:
  0.027140882 = sum of:
    0.027140882 = product of:
      0.04071132 = sum of:
        0.0095056575 = weight(_text_:a in 5144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0095056575 = score(doc=5144,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 5144, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5144)
        0.031205663 = weight(_text_:h in 5144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031205663 = score(doc=5144,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 5144, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5144)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The problem of the equivalence relationship in natural languages and in artificial documentary languages is discussed and it is shown that the use of this concept for synonyms should be avoided. A proposal is made to substitute this concept by similarity or tolerance relationship
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 38(1987) H.2, S.91-94
    Type
    a
  3. Gödert, W.: Sacherschließung im Jahr 2000 : Spielwiese für Theoretiker oder berufsbedingtes Erfordernis? (1988) 0.01 
    0.012642393 = product of:
  0.025284786 = sum of:
    0.025284786 = product of:
      0.037927177 = sum of:
        0.0067215143 = weight(_text_:a in 1551) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0067215143 = score(doc=1551,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1551, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1551)
        0.031205663 = weight(_text_:h in 1551) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031205663 = score(doc=1551,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 1551, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1551)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    BuB. 40(1988) H.10, S.844-849
    Type
    a
  4. Gödert, W.; Oßwald, A.; Rösch, H.; Sleegers, P.: Evit@: Evaluation elektronischer Informationsmittel (2000) 0.01 
    0.012642393 = product of:
  0.025284786 = sum of:
    0.025284786 = product of:
      0.037927177 = sum of:
        0.0067215143 = weight(_text_:a in 1881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0067215143 = score(doc=1881,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 1881, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1881)
        0.031205663 = weight(_text_:h in 1881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031205663 = score(doc=1881,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 1881, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1881)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  5. Gödert, W.: Klassifikatorische Inhaltserschließung : Ein Übersichtsartikel als kommentierter Literaturbericht (1990) 0.01 
    0.012329447 = product of:
  0.024658894 = sum of:
    0.024658894 = product of:
      0.03698834 = sum of:
        0.012023811 = weight(_text_:a in 5143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012023811 = score(doc=5143,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 5143, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5143)
        0.02496453 = weight(_text_:h in 5143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02496453 = score(doc=5143,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 5143, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5143)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Identifies the interest in questions of classified catalogues generated by the development of on-line catalogues, establishing a difference between 2 large areas: free access to information items in a systematic arrangement and expressing the contents of books by means of notational symbols in a classification system in a local catalogue. Examines the elements and structure of classification systems, the internationally important universal classifications, the procedures for book display and systematic processing in West German public libraries and exhibtion techniques in West German academic libraries. Covers universal and faceted classifications, as well as classification systems in on-line catalogues
    Source
    Mitteilungsblatt. VdB NW. N.F. 40(1990) H.2, S.95-114
    Type
    a
  6. Gödert, W.: Literatur zur Inhaltserschließung : ein Projekt an der FHBD in Köln (1994) 0.01 
    0.011906318 = product of:
  0.023812637 = sum of:
    0.023812637 = product of:
      0.035718955 = sum of:
        0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 5148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010754423 = score(doc=5148,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 5148, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5148)
        0.02496453 = weight(_text_:h in 5148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02496453 = score(doc=5148,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 5148, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5148)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Cologne Library School ran a project to construct a database for literature on content cataloguing and fringe disciplines. Software was the BISMAS 1.0 programme and is now the 1.5 version. The category scheme, indexes and retrieval possibilities are described. Retrieval is mainly free text, using the whole document description and all descriptive categories. BISMAS does not permit standard data file administration so a further database was provided ...
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 28(1994) H.10, S.1605-1617
    Type
    a
  7. Gödert, W.: Probleme und Nutzen kooperativer Inhaltserschließung (1987) 0.01 
    0.010856352 = product of:
  0.021712704 = sum of:
    0.021712704 = product of:
      0.032569055 = sum of:
        0.007604526 = weight(_text_:a in 5135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007604526 = score(doc=5135,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 5135, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5135)
        0.02496453 = weight(_text_:h in 5135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02496453 = score(doc=5135,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 5135, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5135)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Reflects on the situation a few years ago in the field of subject access in libraries and evaluates the present situation in the light of recent developments. Discusses factors which characterise the situation in West Germany today. Examines the organisation of cooperative subject access during the course of which various relationships are explored, and the dovetailing of the network and local library operations, and the formation of local and on-line catalogues are discussed. Describes the relationship between formal and subject access; discusses cooperation in the allocation of catchwords, and cooperation in classified subject access; and addresses 2 forms of cooperative subject access
    Source
    Libri. 37(1987) H.1, S.25-37
    Type
    a
  8. Gödert, W.: Verbale Inhaltserschließung : Ein Übersichtsartikel als kommentierter Literaturbericht (1991) 0.01 
    0.010856352 = product of:
  0.021712704 = sum of:
    0.021712704 = product of:
      0.032569055 = sum of:
        0.007604526 = weight(_text_:a in 5142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007604526 = score(doc=5142,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 5142, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5142)
        0.02496453 = weight(_text_:h in 5142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02496453 = score(doc=5142,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 5142, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5142)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Investigates current thinking on the theory and application of index language. Explains their links with on-line retrieval systems and the need to go beyond a narrow library application, identifying 2 regularly occurring points of view: transferring traditional ideas about conventional keyword catalogues to post-coordinate on-line searches and redundant terminology about input and its replacement by pure subject searching. Explores the general subject literature, the theory of verbal documentation languages, syntactical indexing, the thesaurus principle and faceted classification structure
    Source
    Mitteilungsblatt. VdB NW. N.F. 41(1991) H.1, S.1-27
    Type
    a
  9. Gödert, W.: Vom Nutzen einer syntaktischen Indexierung im Online Retrieval (1994) 0.01 
    0.010856352 = product of:
  0.021712704 = sum of:
    0.021712704 = product of:
      0.032569055 = sum of:
        0.007604526 = weight(_text_:a in 5150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007604526 = score(doc=5150,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 5150, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5150)
        0.02496453 = weight(_text_:h in 5150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02496453 = score(doc=5150,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 5150, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5150)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Since the introduction of Regeln fur den Schlagwortkatalog (RSWK - Subject Cataloguing Rules) and the arrival of online public catalogues, librarians might ask whether number building is essential or whether the same result could be achieved with Boolean operators. Descriptive categories could be prepared, with word or phrase inversion, as a retrieval system component. The role of syntactic indexing in online retrieval and consequences for service interface ...
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 28(1994) H.5, S.654-674
    Type
    a
  10. Gödert, W.: Klassifikationssysteme und Online-Katalog (1987) 0.01 
    0.010274041 = product of:
  0.020548083 = sum of:
    0.020548083 = product of:
      0.030822124 = sum of:
        0.012098727 = weight(_text_:a in 5138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012098727 = score(doc=5138,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.22931081 = fieldWeight in 5138, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5138)
        0.018723397 = weight(_text_:h in 5138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018723397 = score(doc=5138,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 5138, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5138)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Free text searching with keywords in a complete data store is not necessarily the best automatic retrieval method. There must be a proper classification of documents and concepts and the use of a proper classification system avoids problems of terminological deficiency. The dialogue search form makes the on-line catalogue a new information medium. A bibliographic unit must be created with as many search access points as possible, using verbal and classificatory search elements. Verbal search categories must include free text elements for individual search access requirements and a controlled vocabulary with syntactic connections. Classified data should consist of a universal classification system with clear structural notation for access and surface searching, together with several specialist subject classifications for differentiated documentation and retrieval. The universal classification needs no detailed subdivision: it serves mainly as a guide and entry to the detailed sub-systems
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 34(1987) H.3, S.185-195
    Type
    a
  11. Gödert, W.: Navigation und Konzepte für ein interaktives Retrieval im OPAC : Oder: Von der Informationserschließung zur Wissenserkundung (2004) 0.01 
    0.010113914 = product of:
  0.020227827 = sum of:
    0.020227827 = product of:
      0.03034174 = sum of:
        0.0053772116 = weight(_text_:a in 2195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053772116 = score(doc=2195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2195)
        0.02496453 = weight(_text_:h in 2195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02496453 = score(doc=2195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 2195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2195)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    AKMB-news. 10(2004) H.1, S.27-30
    Type
    a
  12. Gödert, W.: Navigation und Konzepte für ein interaktives Retrieval im OPAC : Oder: Von der Informationserschließung zur Wissenserkundung (2004) 0.01 
    0.010113914 = product of:
  0.020227827 = sum of:
    0.020227827 = product of:
      0.03034174 = sum of:
        0.0053772116 = weight(_text_:a in 2491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053772116 = score(doc=2491,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2491, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2491)
        0.02496453 = weight(_text_:h in 2491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02496453 = score(doc=2491,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 2491, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2491)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 57(2004) H.1, S.70-80
    Type
    a
  13. Gödert, W.: Semantische Wissensrepräsentation und Interoperabilität : Teil 2: Ein formales Modell semantischer Interoperabilität (2010) 0.01 
    0.010113914 = product of:
  0.020227827 = sum of:
    0.020227827 = product of:
      0.03034174 = sum of:
        0.0053772116 = weight(_text_:a in 1530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053772116 = score(doc=1530,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1530, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1530)
        0.02496453 = weight(_text_:h in 1530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02496453 = score(doc=1530,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 1530, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1530)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 61(2010) H.1, S.19-28
    Type
    a
  14. Gödert, W.: Verbale Sacherschließung im Fach Mathematik (1979) 0.01 
    0.010113914 = product of:
  0.020227827 = sum of:
    0.020227827 = product of:
      0.03034174 = sum of:
        0.0053772116 = weight(_text_:a in 4573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053772116 = score(doc=4573,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4573, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4573)
        0.02496453 = weight(_text_:h in 4573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02496453 = score(doc=4573,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 4573, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4573)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 3(1979) H.3, S.170-190
    Type
    a
  15. Gödert, W.: Bibliothekarische Klassifikationssysteme und on-line-Kataloge : Grundlagen und Anwendungen (1987) 0.01 
    0.010113914 = product of:
  0.020227827 = sum of:
    0.020227827 = product of:
      0.03034174 = sum of:
        0.0053772116 = weight(_text_:a in 4576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053772116 = score(doc=4576,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4576, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4576)
        0.02496453 = weight(_text_:h in 4576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02496453 = score(doc=4576,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 4576, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4576)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 11(1987) H.2, S.152-166
    Type
    a
  16. Gödert, W.: ¬Ein Ontologie basiertes Modell für Indexierung und Retrieval (2014) 0.01 
    0.010113914 = product of:
  0.020227827 = sum of:
    0.020227827 = product of:
      0.03034174 = sum of:
        0.0053772116 = weight(_text_:a in 1266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053772116 = score(doc=1266,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1266, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1266)
        0.02496453 = weight(_text_:h in 1266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02496453 = score(doc=1266,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 1266, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1266)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 65(2014) H.2, S.83-98
    Type
    a
  17. Gödert, W.; Liebig, M.: Maschinelle Indexierung auf dem Prüfstand : Ergebnisse eines Retrievaltests zum MILOS II Projekt (1997) 0.01 
    0.009997789 = product of:
  0.019995578 = sum of:
    0.019995578 = product of:
      0.029993366 = sum of:
        0.008149404 = weight(_text_:a in 1174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008149404 = score(doc=1174,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 1174, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1174)
        0.021843962 = weight(_text_:h in 1174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021843962 = score(doc=1174,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 1174, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1174)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The test ran between Nov 95-Aug 96 in Cologne Fachhochschule fur Bibliothekswesen (College of Librarianship).The test basis was a database of 190,000 book titles published between 1990-95. MILOS II mechanized indexing methods proved helpful in avoiding or reducing numbers of unsatisfied/no result retrieval searches. Retrieval from mechanised indexing is 3 times more successful than from title keyword data. MILOS II also used a standardized semantic vocabulary. Mechanised indexing demands high quality software and output data
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 31(1997) H.1, S.59-68
    Type
    a
  18. Gödert, W.: Multimedia-Enzyklopädien auf CD-ROM : eine vergleichende Analyse von Allgemeinenzyklopädien (1994) 0.01 
    0.009533545 = product of:
  0.01906709 = sum of:
    0.01906709 = product of:
      0.028600635 = sum of:
        0.003802263 = weight(_text_:a in 5976) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003802263 = score(doc=5976,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.072065435 = fieldWeight in 5976, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5976)
        0.024798373 = weight(_text_:22 in 5976) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024798373 = score(doc=5976,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5976, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5976)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Classification
    All A 87 / Lexikographie
    Date
    22. 3.2008 16:17:15
    SBB
    All A 87 / Lexikographie
  19. Gödert, W.: Zur semantischen Struktur der Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD): ein Beitrag zur Problematik des induktiven Aufbaus kontrollierten Vokabulars (1990) 0.01 
    0.009499308 = product of:
  0.018998615 = sum of:
    0.018998615 = product of:
      0.028497923 = sum of:
        0.0066539603 = weight(_text_:a in 5136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0066539603 = score(doc=5136,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 5136, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5136)
        0.021843962 = weight(_text_:h in 5136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021843962 = score(doc=5136,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 5136, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5136)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Librarians in West Germany have thesauri for subject cataloguing through the use of Regeln fur den Schlagwortkatalog (RSWK - Subject Cataloguing Rules) with the Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD - Standard Keyword Data File). There is controversy over the terminological properties of standard keyword data files, over whether SWD is universal and whether inductive vocabulary construction is successful here. Some RSWK chain components have no separate semantic isentity and, although SWD has several aids for definition precision, semantic structures are not fully expressed. At present cooperative cataloguing partners using RSWK should use SWD with it as a starting point and think about possible improvements. RSWK with SWD is at present unsuitable for personal computers
    Source
    Libri. 40(1990) H.3, S.228-241
    Type
    a
  20. Gödert, W.: Surfen, suchen, finden : neue Herausforderungen für die Informationserschließung (1998) 0.01 
    0.008849675 = product of:
  0.01769935 = sum of:
    0.01769935 = product of:
      0.026549023 = sum of:
        0.0047050603 = weight(_text_:a in 1029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0047050603 = score(doc=1029,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 1029, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1029)
        0.021843962 = weight(_text_:h in 1029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021843962 = score(doc=1029,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045758117 = queryNorm
            0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 1029, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1029)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    BuB. 50(1998) H.5, S.320-325
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 74
  • el 5
  • m 3
  • u 3
  • r 2
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications