Gödert, W.; Liebig, M.: Maschinelle Indexierung auf dem Prüfstand : Ergebnisse eines Retrievaltests zum MILOS II Projekt (1997)
0.04
0.040197317 = product of:
0.10049329 = sum of:
0.007388207 = weight(_text_:a in 1174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007388207 = score(doc=1174,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04783308 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04148407 = queryNorm
0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 1174, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1174)
0.093105085 = weight(_text_:68 in 1174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.093105085 = score(doc=1174,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2234734 = queryWeight, product of:
5.386969 = idf(docFreq=549, maxDocs=44218)
0.04148407 = queryNorm
0.41662714 = fieldWeight in 1174, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.386969 = idf(docFreq=549, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1174)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The test ran between Nov 95-Aug 96 in Cologne Fachhochschule fur Bibliothekswesen (College of Librarianship).The test basis was a database of 190,000 book titles published between 1990-95. MILOS II mechanized indexing methods proved helpful in avoiding or reducing numbers of unsatisfied/no result retrieval searches. Retrieval from mechanised indexing is 3 times more successful than from title keyword data. MILOS II also used a standardized semantic vocabulary. Mechanised indexing demands high quality software and output data
- Source
- Bibliotheksdienst. 31(1997) H.1, S.59-68
- Type
- a